Pero R W, Ostlund C
Mutat Res. 1980 Dec;73(2):349-61. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90200-6.
Unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in human leukocytes has become a popular tool for estimating an individual's DNA-repair capacity and sensitivity to mutagens. The physical induction of UDS by UV-irradiation, as opposed to the chemical induction of UDS by N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (NA-AAF), has yielded contradictory reports in the literature regarding inter-individual variations relating to risk factors such as age. In an effort to resolve this anomaly, we have compared directly, in duplicate lymphocyte samples from 29 male individuals, the UDS induced by 10 microM NA-AAF and UV-irradiation of 10 J . m-2. The kinetics of UV-induced UDS was very "fast", being 50% complete within 2.5 h whereas the corresponding value for NA-AAF-induced UDS was 7 h. Consistent with our previous studies, individual variations in NA-AAF-induced UDS were positively correlated to age. However, a strong tendency toward both positive and negative correlations to an individual's age could be calculated depending on whether "fast"- or "slow"-UV-induced DNA repair was taken into consideration. These data, therefore, question the validity of previous reports establishing DNA-repair deficiencies when UV-induced UDS was used for quantitation and the "fast" UV repair was only partially estimated because of early delays in the 3H-dThd pulse. If appropriately pulsed with 3H-dThd, then the inter-individual fluctuations in NA-AAF- and UV-induced UDS correlated to each other in a highly significant linear manner (r = 0.51, p less than 0.01). Basic similarities between NA-AAF- and UV-induced UDS were also observed when both parameters correlated to the phytohemagglutinin responsiveness of the lymphocytes. A working hypothesis, based on environmentally influenced changes in chromatin structure regulating the relative accessibility of NA-AAF- and UV-induced lesions for repair, was formulated to explain the parallel inter-individual fluctuations of NA-AAF- and UV-induced UDS.
人白细胞中的非程序性DNA合成(UDS)已成为评估个体DNA修复能力和对诱变剂敏感性的常用工具。与N - 乙酰氧基 - 2 - 乙酰氨基芴(NA - AAF)化学诱导UDS不同,紫外线照射对UDS的物理诱导在文献中就年龄等风险因素的个体间差异产生了相互矛盾的报道。为了解决这一异常情况,我们直接比较了来自29名男性个体的两份淋巴细胞样本中,由10 microM NA - AAF诱导的UDS和10 J·m⁻²紫外线照射诱导的UDS。紫外线诱导UDS的动力学非常“快”,在2.5小时内完成50%,而NA - AAF诱导UDS的相应值为7小时。与我们之前的研究一致,NA - AAF诱导的UDS个体差异与年龄呈正相关。然而,根据是否考虑“快速”或“缓慢”的紫外线诱导DNA修复,对于个体年龄的正负相关性都有很强的趋势。因此,这些数据质疑了先前报告的有效性,这些报告在使用紫外线诱导的UDS进行定量时确定了DNA修复缺陷,并且由于³H - dThd脉冲的早期延迟,“快速”紫外线修复仅得到部分估计。如果用³H - dThd进行适当脉冲,那么NA - AAF和紫外线诱导的UDS个体间波动以高度显著的线性方式相互关联(r = 0.51,p < 0.01)。当两个参数都与淋巴细胞的植物血凝素反应性相关时,还观察到NA - AAF和紫外线诱导的UDS之间的基本相似性。基于环境影响染色质结构变化调节NA - AAF和紫外线诱导损伤相对可修复性的工作假设被提出,以解释NA - AAF和紫外线诱导的UDS的平行个体间波动。