• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌替啶在住院内科患者中的临床疗效。

Clinical effects of meperidine in hospitalized medical patients.

作者信息

Miller R R, Jick H

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Apr;18(4):180-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1978.tb01591.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1978.tb01591.x
PMID:632364
Abstract

Of 26,294 hospitalized medical patients monitored in a drug surveillance program, 366 (1.4%) received meperidine orally and 3268 (12.4%) received meperidine parenterally during one or more admissions. Neoplastic disease was the most common category of primary diagnosis (43%) among oral recipients; among parenteral recipients cardiovascular and neoplastic diseases (23% each) were most common. Oral meperidine was prescribed almost exclusively (93%) for pain relief, whereas the parenteral drug also had substantial use (41%) as a diagnostic and preoperative adjunct. Oral meperidine was judged by attending physicians to have provided unsatisfactory pain relief in 22% of recipients, while parenteral meperidine was rated unsatisfactory in 11%. The drug was less effective in patients with a primary diagnosis of neoplastic disease than in patients with other primary diagnoses. Minor gastrointestinal disturbances were the most commonly reported adverse reactions among oral meperidine recipients (2.7%); among parenteral recipients central nervous system effects were most common (1.2%). Seven recipients had life-threatening adverse reactions. However, only two of these were judged definitely related to meperidine, and in both instances other drugs were also definitely implicated. Adverse reactions were dose related.

摘要

在一项药物监测项目中监测的26294名住院内科患者中,366名(1.4%)在一次或多次住院期间口服了哌替啶,3268名(12.4%)接受了哌替啶注射。肿瘤疾病是口服哌替啶患者中最常见的主要诊断类别(43%);在注射哌替啶的患者中,心血管疾病和肿瘤疾病(各占23%)最为常见。口服哌替啶几乎完全(93%)用于止痛,而注射用哌替啶也大量(41%)用作诊断和术前辅助用药。主治医生认为22%的口服哌替啶患者止痛效果不满意,而注射哌替啶患者的不满意率为11%。该药物对原发性诊断为肿瘤疾病的患者的疗效低于其他原发性诊断的患者。轻微胃肠道不适是口服哌替啶患者中最常报告的不良反应(2.7%);在注射哌替啶的患者中,中枢神经系统影响最为常见(1.2%)。7名患者出现危及生命的不良反应。然而,其中只有2例被判定与哌替啶肯定相关,而且在这两例中也肯定涉及其他药物。不良反应与剂量相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical effects of meperidine in hospitalized medical patients.哌替啶在住院内科患者中的临床疗效。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Apr;18(4):180-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1978.tb01591.x.
2
Clinical effects of pentazocine in hospitalized medical patients.喷他佐辛对住院内科患者的临床疗效。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Feb-Mar;15(2-3):198-205. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1975.tb02357.x.
3
Meperidine: therapeutic use and toxicity.哌替啶:治疗用途与毒性。
J Emerg Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;13(6):797-802. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)02002-0.
4
Comparison of ketorolac and meperidine in patients with postoperative pain--impact on health care utilization.酮咯酸与哌替啶用于术后疼痛患者的比较——对医疗资源利用的影响
Clin Ther. 1993 May-Jun;15(3):571-80; discussion 570.
5
Intramuscular butorphanol and meperidine in postoperative pain.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 Sep;20(3):359-64. doi: 10.1002/cpt1976203359.
6
Meperidine is alive and well in the new millennium: evaluation of meperidine usage patterns and frequency of adverse drug reactions.哌替啶在新千年依然广泛使用:哌替啶使用模式及药物不良反应发生率的评估
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jun;24(6):776-83. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.8.776.36066.
7
Use of meperidine in patient-controlled analgesia and the development of a normeperidine toxic reaction.
Arch Surg. 2002 Jan;137(1):84-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.1.84.
8
Morphine induces less nausea than meperidine when administered parenterally.
J Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;27(3):241-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.011.
9
Butorphanol and meperidine compared in patients with acute ureteral colic.
J Urol. 1979 Oct;122(4):455-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56460-5.
10
Effects of age on meperidine disposition.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Jan;37(1):19-24. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1985.5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Call to Action: Elevating Critical Appraisal Training in Pain Medicine.行动呼吁:提升疼痛医学中的批判性评估培训
J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 30;18:3317-3320. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S549345. eCollection 2025.
2
Care of the child with chronic illness: Are we taking care of their pain?慢性病患儿的护理:我们是否关注到了他们的疼痛?
Paediatr Child Health. 1998 May;3(3):163-4. doi: 10.1093/pch/3.3.163.
3
Bioavailability prediction based on molecular structure for a diverse series of drugs.基于分子结构对多种药物进行生物利用度预测。
Pharm Res. 2004 Jan;21(1):68-82. doi: 10.1023/b:pham.0000012154.09631.26.
4
Drug-induced cognitive impairment in the elderly.老年人药物性认知障碍
Drugs Aging. 1999 Jul;15(1):15-28. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199915010-00002.
5
Irrational attitudes toward addicts and narcotics.对成瘾者和麻醉品的非理性态度。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1985 Oct;61(8):706-27.