Baxter R C, Zaltsman Z, Turtle J R
Endocrinology. 1984 May;114(5):1893-901. doi: 10.1210/endo-114-5-1893.
This study was designed to elucidate which hormone is responsible for the induction of GH and PRL receptors in rat liver. Intact female rats were implanted with osmotic minipumps delivering rat GH (rGH) or ovine GH (oGH) or PRL at various rates from 75 to 800 micrograms/day for 7 days, and binding of radioiodinated bovine GH or ovine PRL (oPRL) tracer was measured on liver microsomal membranes. MgCl2 treatment was used to remove bound hormones from receptors before tracer binding. Infusion of rGH resulted in a significant increase (P less than 0.001) in both GH and PRL binding, the effect being maximal (2.5- to 3-fold for both ligands) at rGH infusion rates from 150 to 400 micrograms/day. Serum rGH levels were elevated 3- to 5-fold in these animals, but somatomedin-C concentrations were not higher than in controls. MgCl2 treatment showed that GH, but not PRL, binding sites in rGH-treated animals were significantly occupied by administered hormone. Analysis of competitive binding curves indicated that receptors for both GH and PRL increased in concentration without changes in binding affinity. In contrast to the rGH effect, oGH infusion from 75 to 400 micrograms/day failed in two experiments to consistently alter either bovine GH or oPRL binding sites. This was not explained by the potency of the preparation at the somatogenic receptor; oGH was in fact more potent than rGH. The effects of rat PRL and oPRL infusion on receptor levels were also assessed. In contrast to previous reports, neither preparation caused induction of either PRL or GH binding sites. oPRL decreased PRL binding by 30-40% when infused between 200 and 400 micrograms/day, whereas rat PRL had a less consistent effect. MgCl2 stripping of membranes suggested that administered PRL preparations did not significantly occupy PRL receptors. GH receptors were unaffected in any PRL-treated group. It is concluded that in intact female rats, rGH regulates the concentration of both GH and PRL receptors. The slight down-regulation of PRL receptors resulting from PRL infusion casts further doubt on the concept that PRL induces its own hepatic receptors.
本研究旨在阐明哪种激素负责诱导大鼠肝脏中生长激素(GH)和催乳素(PRL)受体。将完整的雌性大鼠植入渗透微型泵,以每天75至800微克的不同速率输送大鼠GH(rGH)、绵羊GH(oGH)或PRL,持续7天,并在肝微粒体膜上测量放射性碘化牛GH或绵羊PRL(oPRL)示踪剂的结合情况。在示踪剂结合之前,使用MgCl2处理从受体上去除结合的激素。输注rGH导致GH和PRL结合均显著增加(P<0.001),在rGH输注速率为每天150至400微克时,这种效应最大(两种配体均为2.5至3倍)。这些动物的血清rGH水平升高了3至5倍,但生长调节素-C浓度并不高于对照组。MgCl2处理表明,在接受rGH治疗的动物中,GH结合位点被给予的激素显著占据,而PRL结合位点未被占据。竞争性结合曲线分析表明,GH和PRL受体的浓度增加,而结合亲和力没有变化。与rGH的作用相反,在两个实验中,每天输注75至400微克的oGH未能持续改变牛GH或oPRL结合位点。这不能用该制剂在生长受体上的效力来解释;事实上,oGH比rGH更有效。还评估了大鼠PRL和oPRL输注对受体水平的影响。与先前的报道相反,两种制剂均未引起PRL或GH结合位点的诱导。当每天输注200至400微克时,oPRL使PRL结合减少30%至40%,而大鼠PRL的作用不太一致。膜的MgCl2剥离表明,给予的PRL制剂并未显著占据PRL受体。在任何PRL治疗组中,GH受体均未受影响。结论是,在完整的雌性大鼠中,rGH调节GH和PRL受体的浓度。PRL输注导致PRL受体略有下调,这进一步质疑了PRL诱导其自身肝脏受体的概念。