Hugli T E, Morgan E L
Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1984;14:109-53. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4862-8_4.
Progress over the past five years has drawn attention to the fact that the anaplylatoxins are important factors in both leukocyte activation and regulation events. The C5 anaphylatoxin has been proposed to play major role in leukocyte aggregation and adherence phenomenon. Influences of C5a on the leukocyte may lead to clinical manifestations such as respiratory distress syndrome after trauma or postpump syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass, both effects derived from leukocyte sequestration. Many other clinical conditions involving repeated transient sequestration of leukocytes, particularly in the pulmonary vasculature, may eventually be recognized as a complication of systemic complement activation. Dramatic pathologic changes observed in the lungs of animals exposed to either C3a or C5a emphasizes the potential damage that these factors may exert via cellular activation mechanisms (Huey et al., 1983). More recent evidence that the anaphylatoxins are potent immunoregulatory factors under in vitro conditions suggests a physiologic role for these humoral factors in nonspecific modulation of the immune response. It is an attractive hypothesis to suggest that once activated, complement is capable of relaying information to the cellular immune system via the anaphylatoxins. Other components of the complement system have long been known to exert regulatory influences on the immune system, and perhaps molecular description of such entities as the C3d-K fragment will serve to unravel this seemingly more complex effector system. In any case, as our understanding of both the chemical and biologic nature of factors derived from blood complement components advances, it has become apparent that a major function of complement may be to modulate the immune response. We have already demonstrated that these factors are selective both for cell type and for eliciting a variety of cellular responses. From this, one can infer that manipulation of the cellular events will eventually be possible. Hence a therapeutic value may be realized once involvement of these complement factors under in vivo conditions is better characterized.
过去五年的研究进展使人们注意到,过敏毒素是白细胞激活和调节过程中的重要因素。有人提出C5过敏毒素在白细胞聚集和黏附现象中起主要作用。C5a对白细胞的影响可能导致一些临床表现,如创伤后呼吸窘迫综合征或体外循环后泵后综合征,这两种效应均源于白细胞隔离。许多其他涉及白细胞反复短暂隔离的临床情况,特别是在肺血管系统中,最终可能被认为是全身补体激活的并发症。在暴露于C3a或C5a的动物肺部观察到的显著病理变化,强调了这些因素可能通过细胞激活机制造成的潜在损害(休伊等人,1983年)。最近有证据表明,过敏毒素在体外条件下是有效的免疫调节因子,这表明这些体液因子在免疫反应的非特异性调节中具有生理作用。有一种很有吸引力的假说认为,一旦被激活,补体能够通过过敏毒素将信息传递给细胞免疫系统。补体系统的其他成分长期以来已知对免疫系统有调节作用,也许对诸如C3d-K片段等实体的分子描述将有助于揭示这个看似更复杂的效应系统。无论如何,随着我们对血液补体成分衍生因子的化学和生物学性质的理解不断深入,很明显补体的一个主要功能可能是调节免疫反应。我们已经证明,这些因子对细胞类型具有选择性,并能引发多种细胞反应。由此可以推断,最终有可能对细胞事件进行操控。因此,一旦更好地明确这些补体因子在体内条件下的作用,就可能实现其治疗价值。