Prins G S, Vogelzang R L
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1984 Dec;1(4):221-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01131620.
Determination of ovarian follicular size and number by real-time ultrasound lacks the precision that has been ascribed to it. Four major error sources inherent in the scanning and interpreting process were analyzed to determine the relative contributions to overall variation. The sources measured were machine, sonographer, sonologist, and patient bladder volume. A protocol using a normal clomiphene-stimulated woman allowed the determination of the coefficient of variance for both follicular number and follicular diameter as well as a mean diameter range in each of the categories. A large degree of variation was found in all groups. Surprisingly, it was noted that maximal bladder filling did not produce optimal images. We believe that while variability in ultrasound can be recognized and lessened, it cannot be eliminated. Thus, caution must be used when ultrasound follicular comparisons are made within each program from day to day and particularly between institutions. A liberal range should be allowed for optimal follicle sizes for any given stimulation protocol.
通过实时超声测定卵巢卵泡大小和数量缺乏人们赋予它的精准度。分析了扫描和解读过程中固有的四个主要误差来源,以确定其对总体变异的相对贡献。所测量的误差来源包括机器、超声检查技师、超声科医生以及患者膀胱容量。使用一名正常克罗米芬刺激的女性的方案,能够确定卵泡数量和卵泡直径的变异系数,以及每个类别中的平均直径范围。所有组中均发现了很大程度的变异。令人惊讶的是,注意到膀胱最大程度充盈并未产生最佳图像。我们认为,虽然超声检查中的变异性能够被识别并减小,但无法消除。因此,在每个项目中每天进行超声卵泡比较时,尤其是在不同机构之间进行比较时,必须谨慎。对于任何给定的刺激方案,应允许最佳卵泡大小有一个宽松的范围。