Watson S, Giacoia G P
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1983 Jan;22(1):30-6. doi: 10.1177/000992288302200104.
The natural history of cholestatic syndromes in infancy remains largely unclarified for lack of sufficient data. Newborn and premature infants are particularly vulnerable to cholestasis because of immaturities in bile-forming mechanisms. Until recently, two board categories of etiologic factors has been thought to be associated with cholestasis in early infancy: mechanical obstruction (almost always extrahepatic), and hepatocellular damage (the "neonatal hepatitis" group). Although in both groups specific etiologic factors have been identified, the majority of cases are currently of unknown etiology. Problems in differential diagnosis are reviewed. In the neonatal period, laboratory screening procedures usually do not uncover cholestatic liver disease until the infants become icteric. It is important to not that patients with liver dysfunction may remain anicteric or become anicteric while cholestasis persists. It is, therefore, important that biochemical markers of cholestasis other than conjugated bilirubin be found.
由于缺乏足够的数据,婴儿胆汁淤积综合征的自然病程在很大程度上仍不明确。新生儿和早产儿由于胆汁形成机制不成熟,特别容易发生胆汁淤积。直到最近,人们认为有两大类病因与婴儿早期胆汁淤积有关:机械性梗阻(几乎总是肝外梗阻)和肝细胞损伤(“新生儿肝炎”组)。虽然在这两组中都已确定了具体的病因,但目前大多数病例的病因仍不明。本文对鉴别诊断中的问题进行了综述。在新生儿期,实验室筛查程序通常在婴儿出现黄疸之前无法发现胆汁淤积性肝病。需要注意的是,肝功能不全的患者可能一直无黄疸,或者在胆汁淤积持续时变为无黄疸。因此,找到除结合胆红素以外的胆汁淤积生化标志物很重要。