• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收缩期时间间期作为动脉高血压患者对持续β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂压力反应的可能预测指标。一项患者自身对照、安慰剂对照研究。

Systolic time intervals as possible predictors of pressure response to sustained beta-adrenergic blockade in arterial hypertension. A within-patient, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Verdecchia P, Brignole M, Delfino G, Queirolo C, De Marchi G, Bertulla A

出版信息

Hypertension. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):140-6. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.1.140.

DOI:10.1161/01.hyp.5.1.140
PMID:6336719
Abstract

Systolic time intervals (STI) were recorded at rest and during isometric exercise (IHG) in 20 hypertensive outpatients, WHO Stage 1 or 2. In a double-blind crossover study, slow-release metoprolol 200 mg once daily and matched placebo were given for 4 weeks each, at the end of a 2-week placebo washout. Blood pressure and STI were taken in the last day of washout and of either crossover period. Treatment decreased blood pressure and heart rate values at rest and on peak IHG; it didn't modify preejection period index (PEPI), left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), and their ratio at rest, but decreased the ratio between diastolic blood pressure and PEPI (DBP/PEPI ratio) at rest and on peak IHG and lengthened the PEPI at peak IHG. Resting PEPI values on placebo treatment showed a negative correlation with systolic (r = -0.72) as well as diastolic (r = -0.80) pressure reduction on slow-release metoprolol as compared with placebo treatment. The PEP/LVET ratio at rest on placebo treatment showed a negative correlation with systolic (r = -0.78) as well as diastolic (r = -0.82) pressure reduction at rest on metoprolol compared with placebo treatment. Patients with a resting PEP/LVET ratio less than 0.43 showed a reduction in both systolic and diastolic pressure approximating or exceeding 20 mm Hg, whereas patients with a PEP/LVET ratio greater than 0.47 showed a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of less than 10 mm Hg. In patients with a PEP/LVET ratio of 0.43 to 0.47 (50% of the trial population), STI didn't show any correlation with the pressure response to beta-blockade. A positive correlation was found between the DBP/PEPI ratio at rest on placebo treatment and systolic (r = 0.56) as well as diastolic (r = 0.76) pressure reduction at rest on slow-release metoprolol compared with placebo treatment. Thus, STI appeared as promising predictors of the magnitude of blood pressure response to sustained beta-blocking therapy in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, mostly in patients with a resting PEP/LVET ratio less then 0.43 or greater then 0.47.

摘要

在20例世界卫生组织1期或2期高血压门诊患者中,记录静息状态和等长运动(IHG)期间的收缩期时间间期(STI)。在一项双盲交叉研究中,在为期2周的安慰剂洗脱期结束后,分别给予每日一次200mg缓释美托洛尔和匹配的安慰剂,各治疗4周。在洗脱期以及任一交叉期的最后一天测量血压和STI。治疗降低了静息状态和IHG峰值时的血压和心率值;它没有改变静息状态下的射血前期指数(PEPI)、左心室射血时间指数(LVETI)及其比值,但降低了静息状态和IHG峰值时舒张压与PEPI的比值(DBP/PEPI比值),并延长了IHG峰值时的PEPI。与安慰剂治疗相比,安慰剂治疗时的静息PEPI值与缓释美托洛尔治疗时的收缩压降低(r = -0.72)以及舒张压降低(r = -0.80)呈负相关。与安慰剂治疗相比,安慰剂治疗时静息状态下的PEP/LVET比值与美托洛尔治疗时静息状态下的收缩压降低(r = -0.78)以及舒张压降低(r = -0.82)呈负相关。静息PEP/LVET比值小于0.43的患者收缩压和舒张压降低幅度接近或超过20mmHg,而PEP/LVET比值大于0.47的患者收缩压和舒张压降低幅度小于10mmHg。在PEP/LVET比值为0.43至0.47的患者(占试验人群的50%)中,STI与β受体阻滞剂的血压反应无任何相关性。与安慰剂治疗相比,安慰剂治疗时静息状态下的DBP/PEPI比值与缓释美托洛尔治疗时静息状态下的收缩压降低(r = 0.56)以及舒张压降低(r = 0.76)呈正相关。因此,在轻度至中度原发性高血压中,STI似乎有望成为持续β受体阻滞剂治疗血压反应幅度的预测指标,主要适用于静息PEP/LVET比值小于0.43或大于0.47的患者。

相似文献

1
Systolic time intervals as possible predictors of pressure response to sustained beta-adrenergic blockade in arterial hypertension. A within-patient, placebo-controlled study.收缩期时间间期作为动脉高血压患者对持续β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂压力反应的可能预测指标。一项患者自身对照、安慰剂对照研究。
Hypertension. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):140-6. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.1.140.
2
The use of systolic time intervals in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol, labetalol and prazosin.收缩期时间间期在美托洛尔、拉贝洛尔和哌唑嗪抗高血压治疗评估中的应用。
Cor Vasa. 1983;25(5):358-66.
3
[Dynamics of left ventricular systole in primary arterial hypertension with a positive submaximal stress test].[次极量运动试验阳性的原发性高血压患者左心室收缩动力学]
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1986 Sep 15;41(18):497-502.
4
A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity.模拟微重力引起的生理变化期间左心室射血时间测量方法的比较。
Exp Physiol. 2022 Mar;107(3):213-221. doi: 10.1113/EP090103. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
Effect of metoprolol on rest and exercise left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.美托洛尔对特发性扩张型心肌病静息和运动时左心室收缩及舒张功能的影响。
Am Heart J. 2001 Feb;141(2):259. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.112405.
6
A double-blind comparison of once-daily metoprolol controlled-release and atenolol in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension.每日一次服用美托洛尔控释片与阿替洛尔治疗中国轻至中度高血压患者的双盲比较。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995 Jun;9(3):401-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00879028.
7
Effect on intra-arterial blood pressure of slow release metoprolol combined with placebo or chlorthalidone.缓释美托洛尔联合安慰剂或氯噻酮对动脉内血压的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Sep 10;287(6394):717-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6394.717.
8
Abnormal systolic time intervals in obesity and their relationship with the amount of overweight.肥胖患者的异常收缩期时间间期及其与超重程度的关系。
Am Heart J. 1986 Aug;112(2):356-60. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90275-9.
9
Relationship between systolic time intervals and arterial blood pressure.收缩期时间间期与动脉血压之间的关系。
Clin Cardiol. 1986 Nov;9(11):545-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960091104.
10
Age and responses to isometric exercise in hypertension: possible predictors of the antihypertensive effect of diuretics and beta-blockers.年龄与高血压患者等长运动反应:利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂降压效果的可能预测因素
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1985 Oct;23(10):554-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension.β1 选择性β受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 10;3(3):CD007451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007451.pub2.