Leopold D A
Arch Otolaryngol. 1983 Feb;109(2):106-12. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1983.00800160040010.
In the last 20 years, several authors have reported their experience with the treatment of laryngeal trauma. Over 200 cases of laryngeal trauma in the literature were reviewed and compared with the experience at Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Special attention was paid to surgical v medical treatment, type and duration of stenting techniques, and time interval between injury and surgery. Results were compared in terms of voice and airway status. If surgical treatment is not required, the results for airway and voice are generally excellent. In those cases requiring open surgical treatment, the adequacy of airway was independent of the use or method of stenting. Superior voice results were obtained when stenting was not used. In general, better results were obtained when treatment was carried out within the first 24 hours.
在过去20年里,数位作者报告了他们治疗喉外伤的经验。回顾了文献中200多例喉外伤病例,并与纽约州锡拉丘兹市上州医科大学中心的经验进行了比较。特别关注手术治疗与非手术治疗、支架置入技术的类型和持续时间,以及受伤与手术之间的时间间隔。从嗓音和气道状况方面对结果进行了比较。如果不需要手术治疗,气道和嗓音的结果通常很好。在那些需要开放性手术治疗的病例中,气道的充足情况与支架置入的使用或方法无关。不使用支架置入时可获得更好的嗓音结果。一般来说,在伤后24小时内进行治疗可取得更好的结果。