Cohen S E, Woods W A
Anesthesiology. 1983 Jun;58(6):500-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198306000-00003.
This study was designed to determine in postcesarean patients whether in addition to superior analgesic effects, epidural morphine administration results in secondary benefits in maternal well-being and maternal-infant interaction. Following elective cesarean section with bupivacaine epidural anesthesia, 40 healthy mothers received 5 mg preservative-free morphine sulfate in 10 ml of saline, either by the epidural (Group 1, n = 20) or the intravenous (Group 2, n = 20) route, in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Each received a simultaneous injection of saline by the alternate route. Analgesia in Group 1 lasted significantly longer (16.1 +/- 8.8 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.4 h, mean +/- SD; P less than 0.001), and morphine requirements in the first 24 h were significantly less (12.5 +/- 20 mg vs. 36 +/- 21 mg, P less than 0.001) than in Group 2. Seventy-four per cent of patients who received epidural morphine reported excellent analgesia, compared with only 32% of those who received intravenous morphine (P less than 0.05). Although Group 1 mothers ambulated 6 h earlier than those in Group 2 (P less than 0.02), there was no difference between the groups in time of first voiding, number of hours mothers slept, or duration of hospital stay. Mothers in both groups interacted with their infants equally well and for the same duration of time. Itching occurred in 58% of Group 1 patients and only 16% of Group 2 patients (P less than 0.01); the incidences of nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were not statistically different between the groups. No respiratory depression was observed. Benefits of epidural morphine in this patient population appear limited to the provision of improved analgesia and earlier mobility.
本研究旨在确定剖宫产术后患者中,硬膜外注射吗啡除了具有卓越的镇痛效果外,是否还能给产妇的健康状况及母婴互动带来额外益处。在布比卡因硬膜外麻醉下行择期剖宫产术后,40名健康母亲被随机、双盲分为两组,每组20人。第1组通过硬膜外途径、第2组通过静脉途径接受10ml生理盐水中5mg无防腐剂硫酸吗啡的注射,且两组母亲均同时通过另一途径接受生理盐水注射。第1组的镇痛时间显著更长(平均±标准差:16.1±8.8小时 vs. 4.4±2.4小时;P<0.001),且前24小时的吗啡需求量显著低于第2组(12.5±20mg vs. 36±21mg,P<0.001)。接受硬膜外吗啡注射的患者中有74%报告镇痛效果极佳,而接受静脉注射吗啡的患者中这一比例仅为32%(P<0.05)。虽然第1组母亲比第2组母亲早6小时开始活动(P<0.02),但两组在首次排尿时间、母亲睡眠时间或住院时长方面并无差异。两组母亲与婴儿的互动情况相当,时长也相同。第1组58%的患者出现瘙痒,而第2组仅16%的患者出现瘙痒(P<0.01);两组恶心、呕吐及尿潴留的发生率无统计学差异。未观察到呼吸抑制现象。在该患者群体中,硬膜外吗啡的益处似乎仅限于提供更好的镇痛效果和更早的活动能力。