Allen W D, Porter P
Dev Biol Stand. 1983;53:147-53.
Current approaches to the immunological control of enteric E. coli infections in pig herds concentrate on the provision of passive immunity for the neonate by multiple parenteral vaccination of the sow to stimulate colostral antibody production. Little account is taken of the kinetics of the animals' natural immune response. In particular the potential of the gut as a target organ for immunization has largely been ignored in practical disease control. A new approach to the problem, which combines oral with parenteral vaccination, stimulates a colostral antibody response closely mimicking a sow's natural response to infections and comparison between this and classical parenteral vaccination, using an acute E. coli infection model, demonstrated the greater protective efficacy conferred by the new protocol. The widespread use of this method of vaccination has been continuously monitored, using production parameters most relevant to the farming industry. From this evaluation of user experience and results of trials conducted in various locations, a new perspective is emerging which indicates the vaccine has a wider spectrum of biological activity than was expected. Production, health and environmental benefits are arising which could not have been predicted from a model merely concerned with the control of alimentary E. coli infection.
目前猪群肠道大肠杆菌感染的免疫控制方法主要集中在通过对母猪进行多次肌肉注射疫苗来刺激初乳抗体产生,从而为新生仔猪提供被动免疫。很少考虑动物自然免疫反应的动力学。特别是在实际疾病控制中,肠道作为免疫靶器官的潜力在很大程度上被忽视了。一种将口服疫苗与肌肉注射疫苗相结合的新方法,能刺激初乳抗体反应,使其非常接近母猪对感染的自然反应。利用急性大肠杆菌感染模型,将这种方法与传统的肌肉注射疫苗进行比较,结果表明新方案具有更强的保护效果。使用与养殖业最相关的生产参数,对这种疫苗接种方法的广泛应用进行持续监测。通过对用户体验的评估以及在不同地点进行的试验结果,一个新的观点正在形成,即该疫苗具有比预期更广泛的生物活性。正在产生生产、健康和环境效益,而仅关注消化道大肠杆菌感染控制的模型是无法预测这些效益的。