• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡托普利治疗难治性慢性充血性心力衰竭的安慰剂对照试验。卡托普利多中心研究小组。

A placebo-controlled trial of captopril in refractory chronic congestive heart failure. Captopril Multicenter Research Group.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):755-63. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80316-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80316-7
PMID:6350401
Abstract

Ninety-two patients with heart failure refractory to digitalis and diuretic therapy had captopril (n = 50) or placebo (n = 42) added to their therapeutic regimen in a randomized, double-blind trial. During a 2 week dosage titration period, one captopril-treated patient died of an intracerebral hemorrhage. Over the remaining 10 week evaluation period, 1 captopril-treated patient (2%) was excluded from the study because of treatment failure as compared with 12 discontinuations (4 deaths and 8 failures [29%]) among the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Eighty percent of patients in the captopril group exhibited some degree of clinical improvement, whereas only 27% in the placebo group did so (p less than 0.001). The therapeutic advantage of captopril over placebo was evidenced by a mean improvement of 0.52 (2.8 +/- 0.1 to 2.3 +/- 0.1) in the New York Heart Association functional class value as compared with 0.03 (2.9 +/- 0.1 to 2.8 +/- 0.1) with placebo (p less than 0.0001). There was a 24% mean increase in exercise tolerance with captopril (495 +/- 22 to 614 +/- 27 seconds) as compared with 0.4% with placebo (480 +/- 28 to 483 +/- 43 seconds) (p less than 0.01); the captopril group had an increase in the ejection fraction from a mean baseline value of 0.19 +/- 0.02 to 0.22 +2- 0.02 as compared with 0.19 +/- 0.02 to 0.18 +/- 0.002 (p less than 0.05) in the placebo group. A cohort analysis revealed that improvement in exercise tolerance with captopril was gradual and progressive throughout the 12 weeks. Improvement in specific symptoms of heart failure, that is, dyspnea, fatigue and orthopnea, and the reduction of edema also were greater in the captopril-treated patients (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.001). Captopril therapy was well tolerated, although symptomatic hypotension after the first dose caused withdrawal of three patients (3%) from the study. It was concluded that captopril is an effective adjunctive treatment to digitalis and diuretic drugs for patients with refractory heart failure.

摘要

在一项随机双盲试验中,92例对洋地黄和利尿剂治疗无效的心力衰竭患者被纳入治疗方案,其中50例患者服用卡托普利,42例患者服用安慰剂。在为期2周的剂量滴定期内,1例接受卡托普利治疗的患者死于脑出血。在剩余的10周评估期内,1例接受卡托普利治疗的患者(2%)因治疗失败被排除在研究之外,而安慰剂组有12例患者停药(4例死亡,8例治疗失败[29%])(p<0.001)。卡托普利组80%的患者有一定程度的临床改善,而安慰剂组只有27%的患者有改善(p<0.001)。与安慰剂组相比,卡托普利组纽约心脏协会心功能分级值平均改善0.52(从2.8±0.1改善至2.3±0.1),而安慰剂组仅改善0.03(从从2.9±0.1改善至2.8±0.1)(p<0.0001)。卡托普利组患者运动耐量平均增加24%(从495±22秒增加至614±27秒),而安慰剂组仅增加0.4%(从480±28秒增加至483±43秒)(p<0.01);卡托普利组射血分数从平均基线值0.19±0.02增加至0.22±0.02,而安慰剂组从0.19±0.02降至0.18±0.002(p<0.05)。队列分析显示,卡托普利组患者运动耐量在整个12周内逐渐改善。卡托普利治疗的患者在心力衰竭特定症状(即呼吸困难、疲劳和端坐呼吸)的改善以及水肿的减轻方面也更明显(p<0.05至p<0.001)。卡托普利治疗耐受性良好,尽管首剂后出现症状性低血压导致3例患者(3%)退出研究。研究得出结论,对于难治性心力衰竭患者,卡托普利是洋地黄和利尿剂药物的有效辅助治疗药物。

相似文献

1
A placebo-controlled trial of captopril in refractory chronic congestive heart failure. Captopril Multicenter Research Group.卡托普利治疗难治性慢性充血性心力衰竭的安慰剂对照试验。卡托普利多中心研究小组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):755-63. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80316-7.
2
Short- and long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomized trial of lisinopril versus captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure. The Multicenter Lisinopril-Captopril Congestive Heart Failure Study Group.短效和长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:赖诺普利与卡托普利治疗充血性心力衰竭的随机试验。多中心赖诺普利-卡托普利充血性心力衰竭研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 May;13(6):1240-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90294-5.
3
Long-term treatment of severe chronic heart failure with captopril: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, long-term study.卡托普利长期治疗重度慢性心力衰竭:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的长期研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9 Suppl 2:S50-60. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198700002-00012.
4
Comparative effects of therapy with captopril and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. The Captopril-Digoxin Multicenter Research Group.
JAMA. 1988;259(4):539-44.
5
Captopril in mild heart failure: preliminary observations of a long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.
Postgrad Med J. 1986;62 Suppl 1:153-8.
6
Captopril: an update review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in congestive heart failure.卡托普利:关于其药理特性及在充血性心力衰竭中治疗效果的最新综述
Drugs. 1983 Jan;25(1):6-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198325010-00002.
7
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.
8
A double-blind comparison of lisinopril with captopril in patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure.赖诺普利与卡托普利治疗有症状性充血性心力衰竭患者的双盲对照研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9 Suppl 3:S82-8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198700003-00020.
9
Oral amrinone for the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure: results of a multicenter randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled withdrawal study.口服氨力农治疗慢性充血性心力衰竭:一项多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照撤药研究的结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Nov;4(5):855-66. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80044-3.
10
Long-term captopril therapy in severe refractory congestive heart failure.卡托普利长期治疗重度难治性充血性心力衰竭
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):203S-208S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb02078.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardioprotective Role of Captopril: From Basic to Applied Investigations.卡托普利的心脏保护作用:从基础研究到应用研究
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 25;26(15):7215. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157215.
2
An Updated Review of the Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病患者慢性心力衰竭管理的最新综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 11;25(4):144. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504144. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Adequate enrollment of women in cardiovascular drug trials and the need for sex-specific assessment and reporting.
女性在心血管药物试验中的充分入组以及进行性别特异性评估和报告的必要性。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Jun 23;17:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100155. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in HFrEF: Is This the First Disease Modifying Therapy Drug Class Leading to a Substantial Reduction in Diuretic Need?射血分数降低的心力衰竭中血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂:这是首个能显著减少利尿剂需求的疾病改善治疗药物类别吗?
Int J Heart Fail. 2021 Feb 25;3(2):106-116. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2020.0043. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment on Left Ventricular Myocardial Torsion Mechanics in Patients with Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction 2D Speckle Tracking Echocardiography.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者左心室心肌扭转力学的影响:二维斑点追踪超声心动图研究
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2021 Apr-Jun;31(2):59-67. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_118_20. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Updates in pharmacotherapy of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭药物治疗进展
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):516. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4640.
7
Comparative effectiveness of exercise training program in patients with heart failure: protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and network meta-analysis.运动训练方案对心力衰竭患者的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e043160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043160.
8
Heart failure as a substrate and trigger for ventricular tachycardia.心力衰竭作为室性心动过速的基质和触发因素。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;56(3):229-247. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00623-x. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Medical Therapy for Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Heart Disease.缺血性心脏病引起的心力衰竭的医学治疗。
Circ Res. 2019 May 24;124(11):1520-1535. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313568.
10
Ejection fraction improvement and reverse remodeling achieved with Sacubitril/Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中实现了射血分数改善和逆向重构。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Dec 20;7(6):108-113. eCollection 2017.