Suppr超能文献

颞下颌关节紊乱病患者咬合板治疗与放松程序的评估

Evaluation of occlusal splint therapy and relaxation procedures in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

作者信息

Okeson J P, Moody P M, Kemper J T, Haley J V

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Sep;107(3):420-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0275.

Abstract

Twenty-four patients were selected to participate in this study. Twelve patients were randomly selected to receive occlusal splint therapy and the other 12 to receive a simplified relaxation therapy technique. Observable pain scores, maximum comfortable interincisal distance, and maximum interincisal distances were recorded for each group before and after treatment. The occlusal splint group showed a significant decrease in total mean observable pain scores (decrease score of 10.5, t = 3.124; P less than 0.1). The relaxation group showed no significant decrease in total mean observable pain scores (decrease score of 1.8, t = 0.888; P = ns). The occlusal splint group showed a significant increase in the mean maximum comfortable opening (an increase of 12.4 mm, t = 5.085; P less than .01). The relaxation group showed no significant increase in the mean maximum comfortable opening (an increase of 2.3 mm, t = 0.734; P = ns). The occlusal splint group showed a significant increase in the mean maximum opening (an increase of 6.0 mm, t = 2.471; P less than .05). The relaxation group showed no increase in the mean maximum opening (decrease of 0.7 mm, t = 0.343; P = ns). This study suggests that occlusal splint therapy is a more effective treatment for the pain, tenderness, and limited mandibular opening associated with temporomandibular disorders than relaxation therapy. In this study, the relaxation technique used had no significant effect on the patients' pain, tenderness, or limited opening.

摘要

24名患者被选入本研究。随机选择12名患者接受咬合板治疗,另外12名接受简化的放松治疗技术。记录每组治疗前后的可观察疼痛评分、最大舒适切牙间距离和最大切牙间距离。咬合板组总平均可观察疼痛评分显著降低(降低分数为10.5,t = 3.124;P小于0.1)。放松组总平均可观察疼痛评分无显著降低(降低分数为1.8,t = 0.888;P =无统计学意义)。咬合板组平均最大舒适开口度显著增加(增加12.4毫米,t = 5.085;P小于0.01)。放松组平均最大舒适开口度无显著增加(增加2.3毫米,t = 0.734;P =无统计学意义)。咬合板组平均最大开口度显著增加(增加6.0毫米,t = 2.471;P小于0.05)。放松组平均最大开口度无增加(降低0.7毫米,t = 0.343;P =无统计学意义)。本研究表明,对于与颞下颌关节紊乱相关的疼痛、压痛和下颌开口受限,咬合板治疗比放松治疗更有效。在本研究中,所采用的放松技术对患者的疼痛、压痛或开口受限无显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验