Grammer L C, Shaughnessy M A, Suszko I M, Shaughnessy J J, Patterson R
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983 Nov;72(5 Pt 1):448-53. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(83)90580-8.
Twenty-six patients were recruited for a study of the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with IPG. They were randomly assigned to two groups based on skin test titrations to grass allergens. One group was treated in a double-blind fashion before the 1982 grass season with 12 weekly injections totaling approximately 48,000 PNU, and the other group was treated with 12 weekly injections of caramelized glucose histamine placebo. Daily symptom and medication score sheets were completed by all patients each day of the grass season. Blocking antibody rose ninefold in the IPG group (p less than 0.007) but was unchanged in the placebo group. There was no significant change in IgE against rye grass group I in either the IPG or the placebo group. Symptom-score mean in the IPG group was 217 +/- 71 (S.E.M.), statistically lower (p less than 0.02) than the mean in the placebo group 496 +/- 117 (S.E.M.). There were no systemic reactions and only minor local reactions. There was no change in routine laboratory tests in either group. Although two prior studies with grass allergen immunotherapy reported efficacy, these studies did not use symptom-score analysis. This is the first double-blind, histamine placebo-controlled study of grass immunotherapy that demonstrates efficacy by symptom-score index evaluation. IPG is a safe, clinically effective, and potentially cost-effective therapy for grass pollinosis.
招募了26名患者参与一项关于IPG免疫疗法安全性和有效性的研究。根据对草类过敏原的皮肤试验滴定结果,他们被随机分为两组。一组在1982年草季前以双盲方式接受治疗,每周注射12次,总量约48,000PNU,另一组每周注射12次焦糖葡萄糖组胺安慰剂。在草季的每一天,所有患者都要填写每日症状和用药评分表。IPG组的封闭抗体升高了9倍(p小于0.007),而安慰剂组则无变化。IPG组和安慰剂组中针对黑麦草I组的IgE均无显著变化。IPG组的症状评分均值为217±71(标准误),在统计学上低于安慰剂组的均值496±117(标准误)(p小于0.02)。未出现全身反应,仅出现轻微局部反应。两组的常规实验室检查均无变化。尽管之前两项关于草类过敏原免疫疗法的研究报告了疗效,但这些研究未使用症状评分分析。这是第一项通过症状评分指数评估证明疗效的草类免疫疗法双盲、组胺安慰剂对照研究。IPG是一种用于草类花粉症的安全、临床有效的且可能具有成本效益的疗法。