Yokoyama M
Gan No Rinsho. 1983 Aug;29(10):1205-16.
A major objective of phase I trials is to determine the toxicity of a new anticancer drugs. However phase I trials should be conducted with therapeutic intent. After the starting dose has been chosen, MTD should be reached safely and efficiently by dose escalation based on the animal toxicologic data and dose-relationship of toxicity observed in patients under the study, and there is no established scheme for dose escalation. Retreatments and reentries at increasing dose in the same patient may be useful for determining the cumulative toxicity and predicting antitumor activity. A flow of clinical trials recently introduced by the NCI is cited as a new concept of screening of the antitumor activity of new anticancer drugs in phase II trials. Prognostic factors that may affect the antitumor activity should be taken into consideration in phase II trials. In the conduct of phase III trials, there are many difficulties with historical controls, and comparative study should be performed in a controlled randomized fashion with stratification of patients who are categorized by known prognostic factors. In phase IV trials, long-term follow-up of patients is required to demonstrate advantage in survival rates and to monitor late-onset toxicity. The advantages and disadvantages of single-center and multicenter clinical trials are also discussed.
I期试验的一个主要目标是确定一种新的抗癌药物的毒性。然而,I期试验应以治疗目的进行。在选择起始剂量后,应根据动物毒理学数据和在研究中的患者身上观察到的毒性剂量关系,通过剂量递增安全有效地达到最大耐受剂量(MTD),且没有既定的剂量递增方案。在同一患者中以递增剂量进行再治疗和重新入组可能有助于确定累积毒性并预测抗肿瘤活性。美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)最近引入的一系列临床试验被视为II期试验中筛选新抗癌药物抗肿瘤活性的新概念。II期试验应考虑可能影响抗肿瘤活性的预后因素。在进行III期试验时,历史对照存在许多困难,应采用对照随机方式进行比较研究,并对根据已知预后因素分类的患者进行分层。在IV期试验中,需要对患者进行长期随访,以证明生存率方面的优势并监测迟发性毒性。还讨论了单中心和多中心临床试验的优缺点。