Loiseau P, Bossi L, Guyot M, Orofiamma B, Morselli P L
Epilepsia. 1983 Dec;24(6):703-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1983.tb04633.x.
In this double-blind, two-period, crossover trial with randomized treatment assignment, progabide (+/- 30 mg/kg/day) and placebo were compared as add-on to standard therapy in 20 "therapy-resistant" epileptic patients (11 males, nine females; age range, 7-47 years). The duration of each treatment period was 6 weeks. Crossover was performed gradually over 3-4 days. Twenty-four patients entered the study: three dropped out for reasons unrelated to progabide effects; one dropped out during the placebo period because of increased seizure frequency. Of the 20 patients who completed the study, 14 had partial, two partial plus secondary generalized, and four generalized seizures. Preexisting antiepileptic treatment consisted of one antiepileptic drug (AED) in three, two AEDs in eight, three AEDs in five, and four AEDs in four patients (mean, 2.5 AEDs/patient). The following parameters were recorded at biweekly intervals: (a) efficacy parameters--total seizure count, counts of each seizure type, and global clinical judgment; (b) safety parameters--adverse drug effects, brief clinical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests; and (c) plasma concentrations of progabide and of the associated AEDs. Twelve patients were considered to be improved (p less than 0.01) with progabide by global clinical judgment compared with two patients improved with placebo. Nine patients of 20 had a 48-100% reduction of total seizure count in the verum period, leading to a significant reduction of total seizure number and of complex partial seizures in the verum period as compared with the placebo period (p less than 0.05). Adverse effects were reported or observed in 10 patients during the progabide period and in five patients in the placebo period. The side effects were generally mild and consisted of somnolence in four cases and of tremors, dry mouth, troubles of equilibrium, anorexia, euphoria, depression, and anxiety in individual patients; a 15-20% reduction of the progabide dose was required in two cases only. No treatment-related alterations in results of laboratory tests were observed.
在这项双盲、两阶段、交叉试验中,采用随机治疗分配方法,将丙戊酰胺(±30毫克/千克/天)与安慰剂作为标准治疗的附加疗法,对20名“难治性”癫痫患者(11名男性,9名女性;年龄范围7至47岁)进行比较。每个治疗阶段持续6周。交叉在3至4天内逐步进行。24名患者进入研究:3名因与丙戊酰胺作用无关的原因退出;1名在安慰剂阶段因癫痫发作频率增加而退出。在完成研究的20名患者中,14名有部分性发作,2名有部分性发作加继发性全身性发作,4名有全身性发作。既往抗癫痫治疗情况为:3名患者使用一种抗癫痫药物(AED),8名患者使用两种AED,5名患者使用三种AED,4名患者使用四种AED(平均每名患者2.5种AED)。每两周记录以下参数:(a)疗效参数——总发作次数、每种发作类型的次数以及整体临床判断;(b)安全性参数——药物不良反应、简要临床和神经学检查以及实验室检查;(c)丙戊酰胺及相关AED的血浆浓度。通过整体临床判断,与2名使用安慰剂改善的患者相比,12名使用丙戊酰胺的患者被认为有所改善(p<0.01)。20名患者中有9名在使用丙戊酰胺期间总发作次数减少了48%至100%,与安慰剂阶段相比,丙戊酰胺阶段总发作次数和复杂部分性发作次数显著减少(p<0.05)。在丙戊酰胺治疗期间,10名患者报告或观察到不良反应,在安慰剂治疗期间,5名患者出现不良反应。副作用一般较轻,4例表现为嗜睡,个别患者出现震颤、口干、平衡障碍、厌食、欣快、抑郁和焦虑;仅2例需要将丙戊酰胺剂量减少15%至20%。未观察到与治疗相关的实验室检查结果改变。