Catovsky D, Tavares de Castro J
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1983 Oct 8;113(40):1434-7.
The combination of morphological, cytochemical and immunological methods has resulted in a reproducible and more objective classification of AL. Several of the AML-FAB subtypes (M2, M3 and M5) correlate with specific chromosome abnormalities and are associated with distinct clinical and laboratory features. The classification of ALL based on morphology (FAB types L1, L2 and L3) has been shown to have prognostic value. The heterogeneity of ALL is better recognised by membrane marker analysis, now improved by the use of monoclonal antibodies. The enzyme terminal transferase is the best marker for lymphoblasts and helps in the differential diagnosis between ALL and AML. Cases of undifferentiated AL and rare types of AML can be identified by ultrastructural cytochemistry. The clinical significance of the classification of AL is briefly discussed.
形态学、细胞化学和免疫学方法的结合,已实现了对急性白血病(AL)可重复且更客观的分类。几种急性髓细胞白血病-法国白血病研究协作组(AML-FAB)亚型(M2、M3和M5)与特定的染色体异常相关,并具有独特的临床和实验室特征。基于形态学的急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)分类(FAB类型L1、L2和L3)已显示具有预后价值。通过膜标志物分析能更好地认识ALL的异质性,目前单克隆抗体的使用使其得到了改进。末端转移酶是淋巴细胞的最佳标志物,有助于ALL和AML的鉴别诊断。未分化AL病例和罕见类型的AML可通过超微结构细胞化学来识别。本文简要讨论了AL分类的临床意义。