Wilson J F, Marshall R W, Williams J, Richens A
Ther Drug Monit. 1983;5(4):449-60. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198312000-00012.
The various techniques used to measure the concentration of antiepileptic drugs in plasma have been compared using data from the HEATH-CONTROL external quality control scheme. Assay methods were categorized as gas-liquid chromatography with and without derivatization (GLC + D, GLC-ND), radio- and enzyme multiplied immunoassay (RIA, EMIT), thin-layer and high-pressure liquid chromatography (TLC, HPLC), and spectrophotometry and colourimetry. The accuracy of the methods was determined from differences of measurements from the levels of drugs spiked into the samples. Most methods significantly underestimated the spiked drug concentrations. Comparisons of assay precision were made with the standard deviation of measurements or from the performance of individual laboratories in a ranking procedure. Comparable significant differences were found in both analyses. RIA followed by GLC-ND were the least variable methods for phenytoin; EMIT and then GLC-ND were the best for both phenobarbitone and primidone. Spectrophotometric measurements of phenobarbitone were unacceptably variable. TLC and colourimetry performed well for carbamazepine, whereas the GLC methods were the most variable. HPLC topped the list for ethosuximide, whereas EMIT had difficulty with this drug. Methods used for valproic acid were similar in precision. GLC + D was consistently less effective for all drugs when compared with GLC-ND.
利用HEATH-CONTROL外部质量控制计划的数据,对用于测量血浆中抗癫痫药物浓度的各种技术进行了比较。分析方法分为有衍生化和无衍生化的气液色谱法(GLC+D、GLC-ND)、放射免疫法和酶放大免疫法(RIA、EMIT)、薄层和高压液相色谱法(TLC、HPLC)以及分光光度法和比色法。根据样品中添加药物水平的测量差异来确定方法的准确性。大多数方法显著低估了添加药物的浓度。通过测量的标准差或在排名程序中根据各个实验室的表现来比较分析的精密度。在这两种分析中都发现了类似的显著差异。对于苯妥英,RIA其次是GLC-ND是变异性最小的方法;对于苯巴比妥和扑米酮,EMIT其次是GLC-ND是最好的方法。苯巴比妥的分光光度测量变异性大得令人无法接受。TLC和比色法对卡马西平效果良好,而GLC方法变异性最大。HPLC在乙琥胺方面排名第一,而EMIT对这种药物存在困难。用于丙戊酸的方法在精密度方面相似。与GLC-ND相比,GLC+D对所有药物的效果始终较差。