Tully J L, Klapholz H, Baldini L M, Friedland G H
J Reprod Med. 1983 Dec;28(12):827-32.
We performed a randomized, double-blind trial on a relatively low-risk population comparing the use of three doses of cefoxitin vs. placebo in the prevention of infection following primary cesarean section. Major site-related morbidity (endometritis, wound infection and septicemia) was significantly reduced in the cefoxitin group (8.9% vs. 27.8%; p = 0.017). Febrile morbidity alone tended to occur in the cefoxitin group (15.6% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.091), and all five urinary tract infections occurred in the cefoxitin group as well. Total morbidity was therefore not significantly different (cefoxitin, 35.6%; placebo, 31.5% [not significant]). Duration of hospitalization (mean, 6.0 days) and need for further postoperative antibiotic therapy were similar in the two groups. Our study demonstrated a modest benefit from the perioperative use of antibiotics in relatively low-risk patients undergoing primary cesarean section. Issues that need further study include definition of the optimal prophylactic regimen and of high-risk populations for whom prophylaxis would be most helpful.
我们针对相对低风险人群进行了一项随机双盲试验,比较了三种剂量的头孢西丁与安慰剂在预防初次剖宫产术后感染方面的效果。头孢西丁组主要部位相关的发病率(子宫内膜炎、伤口感染和败血症)显著降低(8.9% 对 27.8%;p = 0.017)。仅发热性发病率在头孢西丁组有更高的趋势(15.6% 对 3.7%;p = 0.091),并且所有五例尿路感染也都发生在头孢西丁组。因此,总发病率无显著差异(头孢西丁组为 35.6%;安慰剂组为 31.5%[无显著差异])。两组的住院时间(平均 6.0 天)以及术后进一步使用抗生素治疗的需求相似。我们的研究表明,对于接受初次剖宫产的相对低风险患者,围手术期使用抗生素有一定益处。需要进一步研究的问题包括最佳预防方案的定义以及预防最有帮助的高风险人群的定义。