Comparison of the multivariate analysis and CADENZA systems for determination of the probability of coronary artery disease.

The accuracy of 2 discriminate systems for diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), multivariate analysis (MVA) and Bayesian analysis (CADENZA), was evaluated in 113 patients undergoing electrocardiographic stress testing and coronary angiography. MVA uses weighting factors (F values) generated from our patient data, whereas CADENZA uses probabilities gleaned from an extensive review of the American literature. Overall accuracy was similar. MVA had a higher sensitivity for 1-vessel CAD (75 versus 33%), but CADENZA was better for determining the severity of CAD. The 2 systems provided posterior probabilities for disease that were highly correlated (r = 0.56; p less than 0.001). Both systems suggest the need for further testing based on the probability generated; herein lies their major strength. The application of such systems should help the clinician reach a diagnosis or make a decision as to management in a cost-effective manner.