Colombo M L, Peona V, Ginesu F, Ortu A R, Bagnato A, Dei D, Colombo F, Donno L
Pharmatherapeutica. 1984;3(8):556-65.
A double-blind, multi-centre trial was carried out in 72 patients with acute or chronic infections of the lower respiratory tract to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a sulfamethopyrazine (200 mg)/trimethoprim (250 mg) combination with that of the established combination co-trimoxazole (400 mg sulphamethoxazole plus 80 mg trimethoprim). Patients received treatment for 10 days either with 2 capsules of co-trimoxazole twice daily or in the newer combination group with 2 capsules on Day 1 but then only 1 capsule daily for the remainder of the treatment period. The results of clinical, bacteriological and functional tests showed an excellent or good response in over 90% of patients in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in effectiveness of treatment with the once-daily sulfamethopyrazine/trimethoprim regime compared with co-trimoxazole given twice daily, and both treatments were well tolerated, with only a few mild side-effects, mainly gastro-intestinal ones, being reported.
对72例急性或慢性下呼吸道感染患者进行了一项双盲、多中心试验,以比较磺胺吡嗪(200毫克)/甲氧苄啶(250毫克)组合与已确立的复方新诺明(400毫克磺胺甲恶唑加80毫克甲氧苄啶)组合的疗效和耐受性。患者接受为期10天的治疗,复方新诺明组每日两次,每次2粒胶囊;新组合组第1天服用2粒胶囊,但在治疗期的剩余时间里每天仅服用1粒胶囊。临床、细菌学和功能测试结果显示,每组超过90%的患者有良好或优秀的反应。与每日两次服用复方新诺明相比,每日一次服用磺胺吡嗪/甲氧苄啶方案的治疗效果无统计学显著差异,且两种治疗耐受性良好,仅报告了少数轻微副作用,主要是胃肠道副作用。