Tungsanga K, Chongthaleong A, Udomsantisuk N, Petcharabutr O A, Sitprija V, Wong E C
Department of Medicine, Chulalongkorn Hospital Medical School, Bangkok, Thailand.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1988;56:28-34.
The clinical and bacteriological efficacy of norfloxacin and co-trimoxazole was compared in patients with symptomatic upper urinary tract infections (UTI). Norfloxacin 400 mg or cotrimoxazole (160 mg of trimethoprim plus 800 mg of sulphamethoxazole) were given orally b.i.d. for seven days to 94 Thai patients. Clinical and bacteriological assessments were performed before and at 5, 14 and 21 days after start of treatment. Bacteriological outcome could be evaluated in 69 patients, 35 randomized to norfloxacin and 34 to co-trimoxazole. The bacteriological cure rate assessed four to seven days after treatment was significantly higher in the norfloxacin than in the co-trimoxazole group (94.3% vs. 73.5%; p less than 0.05). Few patients in each group reported mild and transient adverse effects. We conclude that norfloxacin was well tolerated and more effective than co-trimoxazole in the treatment of upper UTI.
对有症状的上尿路感染(UTI)患者比较了诺氟沙星和复方新诺明的临床及细菌学疗效。将94例泰国患者随机分为两组,一组口服诺氟沙星400mg,另一组口服复方新诺明(甲氧苄啶160mg加磺胺甲恶唑800mg),均每日2次,共7天。在治疗开始前及开始治疗后的第5、14和21天进行临床和细菌学评估。69例患者可进行细菌学结果评估,其中35例随机接受诺氟沙星治疗,34例接受复方新诺明治疗。治疗后4至7天评估的细菌学治愈率,诺氟沙星组显著高于复方新诺明组(94.3%对73.5%;p<0.05)。每组均有少数患者报告有轻微和短暂的不良反应。我们得出结论,在治疗上尿路感染方面,诺氟沙星耐受性良好且比复方新诺明更有效。