Fetters L J, Matthews J I
Arch Intern Med. 1984 May;144(5):938-40.
Methacholine challenge has been proposed as a diagnostic test in situations where clinical asthma is suspected but reversible airway obstruction cannot be demonstrated spirometrically. Methacholine challenge was used in 14 patients with suspected asthma and five normal controls. Eight individuals (six patients and two controls) had a reduction in the forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) of 20% or more with 100 inhalation units (IUs) of methacholine; seven additional individuals (six patients and one control) met one or more of the American Thoracic Society's criteria for a positive bronchoprovocation test; and four individuals (two patients and two controls) were not sensitive to methacholine by any criteria. The diagnosis of asthma can be excluded if methacholine does not induce reversible obstruction. However, provocation of reversible obstruction with methacholine is not specific for asthma. More stringent criteria, such as reduction of FEV1 by 20% by 20 IUs of methacholine, would be less sensitive but more specific for asthma.
在怀疑临床哮喘但无法通过肺活量测定法证明存在可逆性气道阻塞的情况下,已提出使用乙酰甲胆碱激发试验作为一种诊断测试。对14例疑似哮喘患者和5名正常对照者进行了乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。8名个体(6例患者和2名对照者)吸入100吸入单位(IU)的乙酰甲胆碱后,第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降20%或更多;另外7名个体(6例患者和1名对照者)符合美国胸科学会支气管激发试验阳性的一项或多项标准;4名个体(2例患者和2名对照者)无论按照何种标准对乙酰甲胆碱均不敏感。如果乙酰甲胆碱未诱发可逆性阻塞,则可排除哮喘诊断。然而,乙酰甲胆碱诱发可逆性阻塞并非哮喘所特有。更严格的标准,如吸入20 IU乙酰甲胆碱后FEV1下降20%,对哮喘的敏感性较低但特异性较高。