Robertson W B
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Apr;11(1):209-26.
It will be obvious to the reader that the author has gone to considerable lengths to exculpate the endometrium from playing a significant role in the aetiology and pathogenesis of infertility. No apology is necessary for this approach as it is known to obstetricians and gynaecologists engaged in the management and treatment of the infertile couple that most causes of infertility have little to do directly with endometrial abnormalities. This does not mean, however, that an endometrial biopsy or curettage specimen has no place in the investigation of the infertile woman. It can be used as an adjunct to the monitoring of the efficacy of treatment for ovulatory failure and in the confirmation and typing of endometrial hyperplasia in the woman with persistent anovulatory cycles. It is virtually indispensable for the diagnosis of genital tuberculosis and as a means of culturing the mycobacterium for antibiotic sensitivity testing so that appropriate therapy can be given. While there are better methods now available, such as laparoscopy, for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, the finding of unsuspected endometritis in the infertile woman can be used as an indicator of low-grade chronic genital tract infection that may not be otherwise apparent. There would seem to be no need for routine investigation of the endometrium in women afflicted with endometriosis or tubal disorders. The most controversial use of endometrial biopsy as an investigational technique is in the diagnosis of luteal deficiency and related disorders. If it is to be used in this circumstance, then it is essential that there should be the closest possible consultation between the clinician and the pathologist. It is too early yet to declare the endometrium always blameless in reproductive failure but there is little hope that purely morphological studies, even at the ultrastructural level, will supply answers to the unresolved questions. The investigation of the complex biochemistry and biology of the endometrium is still very much in the developmental stage. Pathologists interested in reproductive biology must be prepared to adapt and to devise new techniques based on biochemical discoveries to supplement their traditional morphological assessment of this important and fascinating tissue.
读者会明显看出,作者已竭尽全力为子宫内膜在不孕症病因学和发病机制中不发挥重要作用开脱。采取这种方法无需道歉,因为从事不孕夫妇管理和治疗的妇产科医生都知道,大多数不孕原因与子宫内膜异常并无直接关系。然而,这并不意味着子宫内膜活检或刮宫标本在不孕女性的检查中毫无用处。它可作为监测排卵功能障碍治疗效果的辅助手段,也可用于确诊持续性无排卵周期女性的子宫内膜增生并进行分型。对于诊断生殖器结核以及培养结核分枝杆菌进行药敏试验以便给予适当治疗而言,它几乎不可或缺。虽然现在有更好的方法,如腹腔镜检查,用于诊断盆腔炎,但在不孕女性中发现意外的子宫内膜炎可作为低度慢性生殖道感染的指标,否则可能不明显。对于患有子宫内膜异位症或输卵管疾病的女性,似乎没有必要对子宫内膜进行常规检查。子宫内膜活检作为一种检查技术最具争议的用途是诊断黄体功能不全及相关疾病。如果要在这种情况下使用,那么临床医生和病理学家之间必须尽可能密切协商。现在宣称子宫内膜在生殖失败中总是无可指责还为时过早,但即使在超微结构水平上进行纯粹的形态学研究,也几乎没有希望为未解决的问题提供答案。对子宫内膜复杂的生物化学和生物学的研究仍处于非常初级的阶段。对生殖生物学感兴趣的病理学家必须准备好适应并根据生化发现设计新技术,以补充他们对这个重要且迷人的组织的传统形态学评估。