Suppr超能文献

曲唑酮与米安色林在全科医疗中的应用

Trazodone and mianserin in general practice.

作者信息

Beaumont G, Gringras M, Ankier S I

出版信息

Psychopathology. 1984;17 Suppl 2:24-9. doi: 10.1159/000284089.

Abstract

In a double-blind, noncrossover study, general practice patients suffering from depression were treated with either trazodone (100-200 mg, nocte ) or mianserin (60-120 mg, nocte ) for 6 weeks. For entry into the study, a minimum score of 14 on the 17-point Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HDRS ) was necessary. By random allocation, 125 patients (61 on trazodone and 64 on mianserin) entered the study. Altogether there were 43 withdrawals, of whom 31 (72%) had received mianserin. At least one of the reasons for 22 withdrawals from the mianserin group was an unacceptable side effect, frequently being daytime drowsiness. In contrast, only 5 of the trazodone group withdrew because of side effects. These differences in the withdrawal rates for those patients entering the study were statistically significant (p less than 0.001). A total of 82 patients completed treatment and entered the analysis for efficacy; 49 on trazodone and 33 on mianserin. Results show that both treatments were equally effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety. Thus, the mean HDRS score was 21.3 and 21.5 for trazodone and mianserin, respectively, at the start of treatment which decreased to 6.2 and 5.9, respectively, at the end of 6 weeks. The mean Zung self-rating anxiety scores for trazodone and mianserin were 45.6 and 44.4 at the start of treatment and 33.6 and 31.1 at the end of the study. The results suggest that, on the basis of fewer significant side effects, trazodone is more acceptable to mianserin in treating depression, with or without anxiety, in general practice patients.

摘要

在一项双盲、非交叉研究中,患有抑郁症的全科医疗患者接受曲唑酮(100 - 200毫克,每晚一次)或米安色林(60 - 120毫克,每晚一次)治疗6周。进入该研究的条件是,在17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)上的最低得分需达到14分。通过随机分配,125名患者(61名接受曲唑酮治疗,64名接受米安色林治疗)进入研究。总共有43名患者退出,其中31名(72%)接受了米安色林治疗。米安色林组22名患者退出的原因中至少有一个是不可接受的副作用,常见的是日间嗜睡。相比之下,曲唑酮组只有5名患者因副作用退出。进入研究的患者在退出率上的这些差异具有统计学意义(p小于0.001)。共有82名患者完成治疗并进入疗效分析;49名接受曲唑酮治疗,33名接受米安色林治疗。结果表明,两种治疗方法在减轻抑郁和焦虑症状方面同样有效。因此,治疗开始时曲唑酮和米安色林的HDRS平均得分分别为21.3和21.5,6周结束时分别降至6.2和5.9。曲唑酮和米安色林治疗开始时的Zung自评焦虑平均得分分别为45.6和44.4,研究结束时分别为33.6和31.1。结果表明,基于较少的显著副作用,在治疗全科医疗患者的抑郁症(无论有无焦虑)时,曲唑酮比米安色林更易被接受。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验