Wallace G, Mindlin L J
Anesth Analg. 1984 Jun;63(6):571-6.
The safety and efficacy of lorazepam and hydroxyzine, administered intramuscularly for surgical premedication, were compared in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Ninety patients were given either 0.05 mg/kg of lorazepam (maximum 4 mg), 1.5 mg/kg of hydroxyzine (maximum, 100 mg), or 1 ml of normal saline before surgery. By 60 min after injection, patients given lorazepam or hydroxyzine were significantly (P less than 0.05) more sedated than the placebo-treated patients. The sedative effect of lorazepam lasted longer than that of hydroxyzine. Baseline anxiety scores were low; thus differences in the anxiolytic effect of the test drugs were not detected. Lorazepam-treated patients were consistently less able to recall postinjection events than patients treated with hydroxyzine or placebo. The frequency of injection-site reactions was similar in the three treatment groups. Premedication with lorazepam was considered satisfactory by a higher percentage of patients (77%) than was that with hydroxyzine (62%) or placebo (34%); only lorazepam was considered significantly (P less than 0.005) superior to placebo. The advantages of a longer duration of sedative effect, a greater effect on recall, and higher patient acceptance favor the use of lorazepam over hydroxyzine for surgical premedication.
在一项双盲安慰剂对照研究中,比较了肌肉注射劳拉西泮和羟嗪用于手术前用药的安全性和有效性。90名患者在手术前分别接受了0.05mg/kg的劳拉西泮(最大剂量4mg)、1.5mg/kg的羟嗪(最大剂量100mg)或1ml生理盐水。注射后60分钟时,接受劳拉西泮或羟嗪治疗的患者比接受安慰剂治疗的患者镇静效果显著更强(P<0.05)。劳拉西泮的镇静作用持续时间比羟嗪更长。基线焦虑评分较低,因此未检测到受试药物在抗焦虑作用方面的差异。与接受羟嗪或安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受劳拉西泮治疗的患者对注射后事件的回忆能力持续较低。三个治疗组中注射部位反应的发生率相似。与羟嗪(62%)或安慰剂(34%)相比,更高比例的患者(77%)认为劳拉西泮作为术前用药令人满意;只有劳拉西泮被认为显著优于安慰剂(P<0.005)。劳拉西泮具有镇静作用持续时间更长、对回忆影响更大以及患者接受度更高的优势,因此在手术前用药方面比羟嗪更受青睐。