Siegelman M
Arch Sex Behav. 1978 Jan;7(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01541894.
The present investigation of British subjects replicated an investigation conducted in the United States. There was considerable agreement in the findings of the two studies. A multidimensional evaluation of adjustment, based on questionnaire data, indicated that the total sample of British homosexuals described themselves as less well adjusted than the heterosexuals on four factors, better adjusted on two factors, and not different on six factors. There was a significant difference on only one dimension, however, for selected groups of masculine homosexuals vs. heterosexuals. Homosexuals and heterosexuals low on feminity, in addition, tended to be better adjusted than homosexuals and heterosexuals high on femininity. The possible confusion between adjustment and masculinity-femininity, as well as the importance of using a multidimensional approach when considering adjustment, is discussed.
本次对英国受试者的调查重复了在美国进行的一项调查。两项研究的结果有相当大的一致性。基于问卷调查数据的多维适应评估表明,英国同性恋者的总样本在四个因素上认为自己的适应状况不如异性恋者,在两个因素上认为自己的适应状况更好,在六个因素上没有差异。然而,对于特定组的男性同性恋者与异性恋者,仅在一个维度上存在显著差异。此外,女性气质得分低的同性恋者和异性恋者往往比女性气质得分高的同性恋者和异性恋者适应状况更好。本文讨论了适应与男性气质 - 女性气质之间可能存在的混淆,以及在考虑适应时使用多维方法的重要性。