• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用三甲丙咪嗪、西咪替丁或安慰剂预防十二指肠溃疡复发。一项双盲对照研究。

Relapse prevention of duodenal ulcers with trimipramine, cimetidine, or placebo. A double-blind comparison.

作者信息

Becker U, Faurschou P, Jensen J, Lindorff K, Pedersen P B, Ranløv P J

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984 May;19(3):405-10.

PMID:6377466
Abstract

In a double-blind study 83 patients with duodenal ulcers, initially healed after treatment with either 1 g cimetidine daily or 50 mg trimipramine daily, were allocated by randomization to maintenance treatment with either 400 mg cimetidine daily, 25 mg trimipramine daily, or placebo for 6 months. Monthly clinical interviews were carried out and endoscopy performed whenever the symptoms suggested ulcer relapse. After 6 months the treatment was discontinued, and the patients were observed similarly for another 6-month period. After 6 months of maintenance treatment 88% in the cimetidine group versus 55% in the trimipramine group and 53% in the placebo group remained in symptomatic remission, yielding a significant difference between the cimetidine-treated patients and the two other groups (P less than 0.05). After a further 6 months of drug-free follow-up study, the percentages were 48% versus 29% and 29% in the cimetidine, trimipramine, and placebo groups, respectively (P less than 0.05). Thus maintenance treatment with trimipramine proved no better than placebo in preventing relapses of duodenal ulcers. Second, maintenance treatment with 400 mg cimetidine daily did prevent ulcer relapse, and, third, maintenance treatment with cimetidine for 6 months did not alter the long-term course of the duodenal ulcer disease.

摘要

在一项双盲研究中,83例十二指肠溃疡患者最初分别接受每日1克西咪替丁或每日50毫克曲米帕明治疗后痊愈,然后通过随机分组接受每日400毫克西咪替丁、每日25毫克曲米帕明或安慰剂维持治疗6个月。每月进行临床访谈,每当出现症状提示溃疡复发时进行内镜检查。6个月后停止治疗,对患者进行类似观察,为期6个月。维持治疗6个月后,西咪替丁组88%的患者、曲米帕明组55%的患者和安慰剂组53%的患者仍处于症状缓解状态,西咪替丁治疗的患者与其他两组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在进一步6个月的停药随访研究后,西咪替丁组、曲米帕明组和安慰剂组的百分比分别为48%、29%和29%(P<0.05)。因此,曲米帕明维持治疗在预防十二指肠溃疡复发方面并不比安慰剂更好。其次,每日400毫克西咪替丁维持治疗确实可预防溃疡复发,第三,西咪替丁维持治疗6个月并未改变十二指肠溃疡疾病的长期病程。

相似文献

1
Relapse prevention of duodenal ulcers with trimipramine, cimetidine, or placebo. A double-blind comparison.用三甲丙咪嗪、西咪替丁或安慰剂预防十二指肠溃疡复发。一项双盲对照研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984 May;19(3):405-10.
2
Long-term treatment of duodenal ulcer with trimipramine. A double-blind study.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1982 Nov;17(8):1003-7.
3
Treatment of duodenal ulcer with antacids in combination with trimipramine or cimetidine.用抗酸剂联合曲米帕明或西咪替丁治疗十二指肠溃疡。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1980;58:46-52.
4
Prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse by cimetidine: a one-year double-blind trial.西咪替丁预防十二指肠溃疡复发:一项为期一年的双盲试验。
Med J Aust. 1979 Jun 2;1(11):529-31.
5
Cimetidine treatment of duodenal ulceration: short term clinical trial and maintenance study.西咪替丁治疗十二指肠溃疡:短期临床试验与维持性研究。
Gastroenterology. 1978 Feb;74(2 Pt 2):389-92.
6
A double-blind study of trimipramine in the treatment of active duodenal ulceration.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1984 Mar;19(2):190-3.
7
Efficacy of trimipramine and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. A double-blind comparison.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1983 Jan;18(1):137-43. doi: 10.3109/00365528309181573.
8
Comparative study of cimetidine and trimipramine in the short-term treatment of duodenal and gastric ulcer.西咪替丁与曲米帕明短期治疗十二指肠溃疡和胃溃疡的对比研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1983 Jan;18(1):33-8. doi: 10.3109/00365528309181555.
9
Pirenzepine versus cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.哌仑西平与西咪替丁治疗十二指肠溃疡的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1979;57:59-62.
10
Long-term treatment of duodenal ulcer with pirenzepine. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1982;72:225-8.