Maral J, Jacquillat C
Biomed Pharmacother. 1984;38(1):5-12.
Contrary to the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma which is clearly defined, for most solid tumors the place, the type and the intensity of treatments remain under discussion. Experimental results are available to prove the benefit of various drug combinations in which doses, routes of treatment, schedule and number of cycles are carefully evaluated. However considering the difficulties in testing all the combinations which are possible and the lack of trust in the predictive value of experimental studies, it is generally according to clinical results that escalation or reduction of chemotherapy are decided, At the present time and for many solid tumors, escalation is predominating due to the low effectiveness of the current drugs we have at our disposal. It is only in the case of curable solid tumors (for example: carcinoma of the testis, choriocarcinoma) that a reduction phase is possible and this behaviour is justified in avoiding the iatrogenic effects of chemotherapy. Many examples of escalation and reduction are given in clinical cancer chemotherapy.
与白血病和淋巴瘤明确的治疗方式不同,对于大多数实体瘤而言,治疗的部位、类型和强度仍存在争议。有实验结果可证明各种药物组合的益处,其中对剂量、治疗途径、疗程安排和周期数都进行了仔细评估。然而,考虑到测试所有可能组合的困难以及对实验研究预测价值缺乏信任,化疗的增加或减少通常依据临床结果来决定。目前,对于许多实体瘤来说,由于现有药物效果不佳,增加化疗占主导。只有在可治愈的实体瘤(例如:睾丸癌、绒毛膜癌)情况下才可能进入减少化疗阶段,这种做法可避免化疗的医源性影响,是合理的。临床肿瘤化疗中有许多增加和减少化疗的例子。