Hayden F G, Gwaltney J M
J Infect Dis. 1984 Aug;150(2):174-80. doi: 10.1093/infdis/150.2.174.
The therapeutic efficacy of recombinant interferon-alpha 2 (HuIFN-alpha 2) in experimental infection with rhinovirus type 39 was assessed in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Adult volunteers (serum neutralizing antibody titer, less than or equal to 1:2) were given 9 X 10(6) international units of HuIFN-alpha 2 three times a day for five days by intranasal spray (study 1) or drops (study 2) beginning 28 hr after rhinovirus inoculation. HuIFN-alpha 2 did not prevent rhinovirus infection or colds in either study. Treatment by nasal drops and to a lesser extent by spray was associated with significant reductions in duration and quantity of viral shedding. Treatment by drops was associated with significant but modest effects on nasal symptom scores and trends toward reduced quantities of production of nasal mucus. Despite lower nasal wash concentrations of interferon, HuIFN-alpha 2 drops appeared to have greater antiviral activity and therapeutic efficacy than did HuIFN-alpha 2 spray. These findings suggest that HuIFN-alpha 2 may not be therapeutically useful in treating naturally occurring rhinoviral colds.
在两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,评估了重组干扰素α2(HuIFN-α2)对39型鼻病毒实验性感染的治疗效果。成年志愿者(血清中和抗体滴度小于或等于1:2)在接种鼻病毒28小时后,通过鼻喷雾剂(研究1)或滴鼻剂(研究2),每天三次给予9×10⁶国际单位的HuIFN-α2,持续五天。在两项研究中,HuIFN-α2均未预防鼻病毒感染或感冒。滴鼻治疗以及程度较轻的喷雾治疗与病毒排出的持续时间和数量显著减少有关。滴鼻治疗对鼻症状评分有显著但适度的影响,并使鼻黏液分泌量有减少的趋势。尽管滴鼻剂中干扰素的鼻腔冲洗浓度较低,但HuIFN-α2滴鼻剂似乎比HuIFN-α2喷雾剂具有更强的抗病毒活性和治疗效果。这些发现表明,HuIFN-α2在治疗自然发生的鼻病毒感冒方面可能没有治疗作用。