• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Preformulation method for parenteral preservative efficacy evaluation.

作者信息

Akers M J, Boand A V, Binkley D A

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 1984 Jul;73(7):903-5. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600730710.

DOI:10.1002/jps.2600730710
PMID:6381689
Abstract

A method is described for rapidly and reliably evaluating parenteral preservative efficacy. Solutions containing antimicrobial preservatives were challenged with microorganisms, sampled from 0.5 to 6 h following introduction of the challenge, cultured, and counted for surviving microbial cells. Data were analyzed by computer according to two models: linear and quadratic. Decimal reduction times (D values) were calculated for each microbial challenge in each preservative solution. A D value of less than or equal to 2 h for bacteria predicts that the preservative system will pass the British Pharmacopoeia (BP) preservative efficacy test, a more rigorous test than the USP test. Fourteen preservative systems were tested in both neutral isotonic saline solutions and neutral regular insulin solutions. D values and correlation coefficients for both models were calculated. The ranking of preservative effectiveness in neutral saline solutions closely correlated with the results found using neutral regular insulin solutions. The most effective preservative systems were found to be 0.3% m-cresol and various combinations of m-cresol and phenol. The advantages and limitations of this method are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Preformulation method for parenteral preservative efficacy evaluation.
J Pharm Sci. 1984 Jul;73(7):903-5. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600730710.
2
Changes in preservative sensitivity for the USP antimicrobial agents effectiveness test micro-organisms.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1980 Aug;49(1):119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1980.tb01049.x.
3
Preservation of solubilized and emulsified systems I: Correlation of mathematically predicted preservative availability with antimicrobial activity.溶解和乳化体系的保存研究I:数学预测的防腐剂有效性与抗菌活性的相关性
J Pharm Sci. 1978 Sep;67(9):1260-6. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600670919.
4
Optimising concentrations of antimicrobial agents in pharmaceutical preparations: Case of an oral solution of glycerol and an ophthalmic solution containing cysteamine.优化药物制剂中抗菌剂的浓度:以甘油口服溶液和含半胱胺的眼用溶液为例。
Ann Pharm Fr. 2014 Nov;72(6):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
5
Comparison of contamination rates between preserved and preservative-free fluoroquinolone eyedrops.保存型和无防腐剂型氟喹诺酮滴眼液的污染率比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):817-24. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2152-z. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
6
Effects of preservatives, steroids, and ethylenediaminetetraacetate on the antimicrobial activity of sulfacetamide.防腐剂、类固醇和乙二胺四乙酸对磺胺醋酰抗菌活性的影响。
J Pharm Sci. 1983 Dec;72(12):1401-3. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600721208.
7
Evaluation of preservative systems in opthalmic suspension of polymyxin B and dexamethasone by linear regression.通过线性回归评估多粘菌素B和地塞米松眼用混悬液中的防腐剂系统。
Pharmazie. 2007 Mar;62(3):199-204.
8
[The use of preservatives in skin preparations].
Pharmazie. 1984 Sep;39(9):621-5.
9
Attempted measurement of the activity of selected preservative combinations.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1990 Apr;15(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1990.tb00366.x.
10
[Low-level challenge test for the examination of the microbiological susceptibility, during the period of use, of liquid and semi-solid dosage forms in multiple-dose containers (author's transl)].[用于检查多剂量容器中液体制剂和半固体制剂在使用期间微生物敏感性的低水平挑战试验(作者译)]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1981;172(6):478-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative lethality kinetic curves and predictive models of F-value for Listeria monocytogenes using different sanitizers.不同消毒剂对李斯特氏菌杀菌效果的致死动力学曲线和 F 值预测模型的比较。
Food Sci Nutr. 2013 Jan;1(1):27-31. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.5. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
2
Effect of benzyl alcohol on recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist structure and hydrogen-deuterium exchange.苯甲醇对重组人白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂结构及氢-氘交换的影响。
J Pharm Sci. 2011 Oct;100(10):4215-24. doi: 10.1002/jps.22601. Epub 2011 May 5.
3
Comparison of compendial antimicrobial effectiveness tests: a review.
比较药典抗菌效力测试:综述。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011 Mar;12(1):222-6. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9575-9. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
4
The effect of benzyl alcohol on recombinant human interferon-gamma.苯甲醇对重组人干扰素-γ的作用。
Pharm Res. 1997 Jun;14(6):725-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1012190120061.
5
D-value determinations are an inappropriate measure of disinfecting activity of common contact lens disinfecting solutions.D值测定并非衡量普通隐形眼镜消毒溶液消毒活性的恰当方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Jul;57(7):2021-6. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.7.2021-2026.1991.