Alcover I A, Henning R J, Jackson D L
Crit Care Med. 1984 Oct;12(10):888-91. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198410000-00011.
The arrhythmia detection capability of a computer-assisted monitoring system (CAMS) was studied in a large multidisciplinary ICU during an 18-month period. Four patient categories were evaluated: critically ill patients on mechanical volume respirators (group 1), patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (group 2), pacemaker-dependent patients (group 3), and patients on telemetry monitoring (group 4). ECG abnormalities were interpreted by the computer algorithm and recorded on paper. The same ECG abnormalities were analyzed independently by at least two critical care physicians unaware of the computer interpretations. The incidence of false-positive diagnoses (computer system errors) ranged from 10 in 1000 beats in groups 1, 2, and 4, to 20 in 1000 beats in group 3. Movement artifact accounted for 55.3% of all false-positive diagnoses. Of the total number of beats interpreted by the computer, 0.8% were false negatives and 3.8% were true positives. The most frequent true positive was pacemaker malfunction, which was diagnosed with 94% accuracy by the arrhythmia detection system. Significantly, rhythm abnormalities occurred as frequently in patients ventilated with mechanical respirators as in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
在一个大型多学科重症监护病房(ICU)中,对计算机辅助监测系统(CAMS)的心律失常检测能力进行了为期18个月的研究。评估了四类患者:使用机械容量通气机的重症患者(第1组)、无并发症的急性心肌梗死患者(第2组)、依赖起搏器的患者(第3组)以及接受遥测监测的患者(第4组)。计算机算法对心电图异常进行解读并记录在纸上。至少两名不知道计算机解读结果的重症监护医生对相同的心电图异常进行独立分析。假阳性诊断(计算机系统错误)的发生率在第1组、第2组和第4组中为每1000次心跳10次,在第3组中为每1000次心跳20次。运动伪差占所有假阳性诊断的55.3%。在计算机解读的总心跳数中,0.8%为假阴性,3.8%为真阳性。最常见的真阳性是起搏器故障,心律失常检测系统对其诊断的准确率为94%。值得注意的是,使用机械通气机的患者与急性心肌梗死患者出现节律异常的频率相同。