Corney R H
Psychol Med Monogr Suppl. 1984;6:1-47. doi: 10.1017/s0264180100001703.
There is a pressing need to evaluate the different forms of treatment for depressive illness encountered in general practice. This study consists of a controlled, randomized, clinical trial designed to investigate the effectiveness of social work intervention with depressed women. Eighty women aged between 18 and 45 were included and assessed initially by means of a psychiatric and social interview. Those ascertained to be suffering from 'acute' or 'acute on chronic' depression were randomly allocated to an experimental group who were referred to a social worker attached to a general practice or to a control group for routine treatment by their doctor. They were re-assessed 6 months later. Over 60% of both groups were clinically improved at follow-up, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups in clinical, social or medical outcome. Further analyses suggested, however, that those women initially assessed as suffering from 'acute on chronic' depression with major marital difficulties were found to benefit from social work treatment. These patients could be distinguished from the others by their high degree of motivation, by the initial severity of their problems and by the amount of practical help provided by the social workers.
迫切需要评估在全科医疗中遇到的抑郁症的不同治疗形式。本研究包括一项对照、随机临床试验,旨在调查对抑郁女性进行社会工作干预的有效性。纳入了80名年龄在18至45岁之间的女性,并最初通过精神病学和社会访谈进行评估。那些被确定患有“急性”或“慢性复发性急性”抑郁症的患者被随机分配到实验组,该组患者被转介给一名附属于全科医疗的社会工作者,或被分配到对照组,由其医生进行常规治疗。6个月后对她们进行了重新评估。随访时两组超过60%的患者临床症状得到改善,两组在临床、社会或医疗结果方面没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,进一步分析表明,那些最初被评估为患有“慢性复发性急性”抑郁症且存在重大婚姻困难的女性从社会工作治疗中受益。这些患者可以通过其高度的积极性、问题的初始严重程度以及社会工作者提供的实际帮助量与其他患者区分开来。