Burges G E, Holley H P, Burdash N M, Virella G
Diagn Immunol. 1983;1(4):295-302.
The advantages of two different immunological approaches to the diagnosis of systemic candidiasis have been studied. Counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) using purified cytoplasmic protein antigens and quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) using purified polysaccharide antigens have proven to be approaches giving better discrimination between systemic and nonsystemic candidiasis. Using CIE and yeast cytoplasmic proteins we obtained nine positive reactions in 12 patients with systemic candidiasis, and none in 23 patients with other types of C albicans infection or in 30 normal healthy controls. Using quantitative immunofluorescence and mycelial polysaccharide antigen we obtained positive reactions in all tested sera from systemic candidiasis patients (14), but we also obtained positive reactions (although generally of lower magnitude) in 4 of 14 patients with localized or mucocutaneous candidiasis. It appears that although neither of the tests has 100% specificity and sensitivity, their use individually or in combination may result in valuable data to assist in establishing a diagnosis of systemic candidiasis.
对两种不同免疫方法诊断系统性念珠菌病的优势进行了研究。使用纯化的细胞质蛋白抗原进行对流免疫电泳(CIE)以及使用纯化的多糖抗原进行定量免疫荧光(QIF)已被证明是能更好地区分系统性和非系统性念珠菌病的方法。使用CIE和酵母细胞质蛋白,我们在12例系统性念珠菌病患者中获得了9例阳性反应,而在23例其他类型白色念珠菌感染患者或30例正常健康对照中均未获得阳性反应。使用定量免疫荧光和菌丝体多糖抗原,我们在所有系统性念珠菌病患者(14例)的检测血清中均获得了阳性反应,但在14例局部或黏膜皮肤念珠菌病患者中的4例也获得了阳性反应(尽管反应强度通常较低)。看来,虽然这两种检测方法都没有100%的特异性和敏感性,但单独使用或联合使用它们可能会产生有价值的数据,有助于确立系统性念珠菌病的诊断。