Katzberg R W
Invest Radiol. 1984 Nov-Dec;19(6 Suppl):S387-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198411001-00032.
A double-blind randomized study of ten patients compared Hexabrix 32% to Renografin-60 in TMJ arthrography. Equivalent volumes of contrast material were injected under fluoroscopic observation, with film quality and patient subjective response graded independently by three radiologists. In immediate arthrogram quality, Hexabrix was rated excellent; Renografin-60 was rated good. For 10-minute radiographs, Hexabrix had a good to excellent rating; Renografin-60 rated fair to good in image quality. Significantly less pain was experienced with Hexabrix.
一项针对10名患者的双盲随机研究,在颞下颌关节造影中对比了32%的六溴化泛影葡胺和60%的泛影葡胺。在荧光透视观察下注入等量的造影剂,由三名放射科医生独立对胶片质量和患者主观反应进行评分。在即时关节造影片质量方面,六溴化泛影葡胺被评为优秀;60%的泛影葡胺被评为良好。对于10分钟后的X光片,六溴化泛影葡胺的评分是良好至优秀;60%的泛影葡胺的图像质量评分为一般至良好。使用六溴化泛影葡胺时患者体验到的疼痛明显更少。