Spiess B, Leumann E P
Helv Paediatr Acta. 1984 May;39(2):109-15.
Systolic blood pressures were measured by auscultation or with the Parks Doppler system using blood pressure cuffs of various sizes (widths of the inflatable rubber bladders 4, 6 and 7.5 cm). We compared the results obtained by the conventional cuffs with the Pedisphyg cuff-bladder assembly (in which both cuff and bladder coexist) and with a new "separate bladder" method. Here, the inflatable bladder is wrapped around the arm and is held by a separate Velcro band. Readings comparing these methods agreed well when using the 7.5 cm wide bladder, but conventional cuffs with bladders 6 cm and 4 cm wide seriously overestimated blood pressure by an average of 9.0 and 13.3 mm Hg, respectively. The conventional 4 cm cuff should be abandoned, and the "separate bladder" method used instead.
收缩压通过听诊法或使用帕克斯多普勒系统测量，使用各种尺寸的血压袖带（充气橡胶气囊宽度分别为4厘米、6厘米和7.5厘米）。我们将传统袖带获得的结果与Pedisphyg袖带 - 气囊组件（其中袖带和气囊共存）以及一种新的“单独气囊”方法的结果进行了比较。在此方法中，可充气气囊缠绕在手臂上，并由单独的尼龙搭扣带固定。当使用7.5厘米宽的气囊时，比较这些方法的读数吻合良好，但气囊宽度为6厘米和4厘米的传统袖带分别严重高估血压，平均高估9.0毫米汞柱和13.3毫米汞柱。应摒弃传统的4厘米袖带，改用“单独气囊”方法。
