Suppr超能文献

传统的(尼龙搭扣自粘式)袖带会高估婴儿的血压。介绍一种合适的替代方法。

The conventional (Velcro self-adhesive) cuff overestimates blood pressure in infants. Description of a suitable alternative.

作者信息

Spiess B, Leumann E P

出版信息

Helv Paediatr Acta. 1984 May;39(2):109-15.

PMID:6399715
Abstract

Systolic blood pressures were measured by auscultation or with the Parks Doppler system using blood pressure cuffs of various sizes (widths of the inflatable rubber bladders 4, 6 and 7.5 cm). We compared the results obtained by the conventional cuffs with the Pedisphyg cuff-bladder assembly (in which both cuff and bladder coexist) and with a new "separate bladder" method. Here, the inflatable bladder is wrapped around the arm and is held by a separate Velcro band. Readings comparing these methods agreed well when using the 7.5 cm wide bladder, but conventional cuffs with bladders 6 cm and 4 cm wide seriously overestimated blood pressure by an average of 9.0 and 13.3 mm Hg, respectively. The conventional 4 cm cuff should be abandoned, and the "separate bladder" method used instead.

摘要

收缩压通过听诊法或使用帕克斯多普勒系统测量,使用各种尺寸的血压袖带(充气橡胶气囊宽度分别为4厘米、6厘米和7.5厘米)。我们将传统袖带获得的结果与Pedisphyg袖带 - 气囊组件(其中袖带和气囊共存)以及一种新的“单独气囊”方法的结果进行了比较。在此方法中,可充气气囊缠绕在手臂上,并由单独的尼龙搭扣带固定。当使用7.5厘米宽的气囊时,比较这些方法的读数吻合良好,但气囊宽度为6厘米和4厘米的传统袖带分别严重高估血压,平均高估9.0毫米汞柱和13.3毫米汞柱。应摒弃传统的4厘米袖带,改用“单独气囊”方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验