Araujo C E, Tessler J
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983 Feb;19(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(83)90417-0.
The protective effect of oral administration of the thiol compound sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate (MESNA) against urothelial toxicity induced by ifosfamide (IF) was tested in a group of 45 patients with inoperable lung cancer under treatment with IF (2250 mg/m2 on days 2-5) as part of a polychemotherapy regimen repeated in a 4-week cycle. MESNA was given orally on the days of treatment with IF in 3 doses of 840 mg/m2, each administered at 0 hr (= injection of IF), 4 hr and 8 hr p.i. Out of a total of 88 courses of this treatment we observed 10 episodes of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria and no episodes of gross haematuria. In this group of 45 patients under protection with MESNA there were 5 complete remissions and 9 partial remissions (total 31%). A further group of 25 patients under polychemotherapy with IF were treated by conventional prophylactic measures (raised fluid intake and forced diuresis). In this group there were 1 complete and 5 partial remissions (total 24%), but nearly all patients developed either gross haematuria and/or symptoms of bladder irritation (cystitis and pollakisuria). There were no appreciable differences between the MESNA series and the conventional prophylaxis series with respect to either haematological or systemic toxicity of the cytostatic treatment. Our results support the view that MESNA, given orally in conjunction with combined cytostatic regimens which include IF, simplifies the treatment and provides optimum protection for the urinary epithelium. Protection with oral MESNA is particularly suitable for outpatients.
在一组45例无法手术的肺癌患者中,测试了口服硫醇化合物2-巯基乙烷磺酸钠(美司钠,MESNA)对异环磷酰胺(IF)诱导的尿路上皮毒性的保护作用。这些患者接受IF治疗(第2 - 5天,2250 mg/m²),作为每4周重复一次的多药化疗方案的一部分。在IF治疗日口服MESNA,分3次给药,剂量为840 mg/m²,分别在0小时(即IF注射时)、4小时和8小时给药。在总共88个疗程的这种治疗中,我们观察到10例无症状镜下血尿,无肉眼血尿病例。在这组接受MESNA保护的45例患者中,有5例完全缓解和9例部分缓解(总计31%)。另一组25例接受IF多药化疗的患者采用传统预防措施(增加液体摄入量和强制利尿)治疗。该组有1例完全缓解和5例部分缓解(总计24%),但几乎所有患者都出现了肉眼血尿和/或膀胱刺激症状(膀胱炎和尿频)。在细胞毒性治疗的血液学或全身毒性方面,MESNA组与传统预防组之间没有明显差异。我们的结果支持这样的观点,即MESNA与包含IF的联合细胞毒性方案联合口服,简化了治疗,并为尿路上皮提供了最佳保护。口服MESNA进行保护特别适合门诊患者。