• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服替加氟与静脉注射5-氟尿嘧啶治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的对比研究。

A comparative study of oral tegafur and intravenous 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Bedikian A Y, Stroehlein J, Korinek J, Karlin D, Bodey G P

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 1983 Apr;6(2):181-6. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198304000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00000421-198304000-00007
PMID:6402917
Abstract

A randomized study was conducted in patients who had measurable metastatic colorectal cancer to compare the relative efficacy and toxicities of oral tegafur (1 gm/m2/days 1-21) with those of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu, 500 mg/m2/days 1-4, then 250 mg/m2 on days 6, 8, 10, 12). The treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients not responding to 5-Fu treatment were switched to tegafur. Randomization was stratified for presence or absence of liver metastasis and performance status. Partial responses were observed with 5-Fu, 6/32 (19%), tegafur, 7/35 (20%), and in patients who had been switched to tegafur after failing on 5-Fu, 1/20 (5%) with patients evaluable for response. Neutropenia was more common with 5-Fu (32% vs. 1% of treatment courses). Nausea occurred in about half the treatment courses; vomiting occurred in only 22%. Mucositis and diarrhea were more common with 5-Fu and severe in patients with liver function impairment. Neurologic toxicities due to tegafur were mild and occurred in less than 10% of the treatment courses. Oral tegafur and I.V. 5-Fu were equally effective against colorectal cancer, but tegafur was associated with minimal myelosuppression, which makes it suitable for use in combination with myelosuppressive antitumor agents.

摘要

对患有可测量转移性结直肠癌的患者进行了一项随机研究,以比较口服替加氟(1克/平方米,第1 - 21天)与5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu,500毫克/平方米,第1 - 4天,然后在第6、8、10、12天为250毫克/平方米)的相对疗效和毒性。治疗疗程每4周重复一次。对5-Fu治疗无反应的患者改用替加氟。随机分组根据有无肝转移和体能状态进行分层。5-Fu组观察到部分缓解的有6/32例(19%),替加氟组有7/35例(20%),在5-Fu治疗失败后改用替加氟的患者中,可评估反应的患者有1/20例(5%)。5-Fu组中性粒细胞减少更常见(占治疗疗程的32% vs. 1%)。约一半的治疗疗程出现恶心;呕吐仅发生在22%的疗程中。5-Fu组黏膜炎和腹泻更常见,且在肝功能损害的患者中严重。替加氟引起的神经毒性较轻,发生在不到10%的治疗疗程中。口服替加氟和静脉注射5-Fu对结直肠癌同样有效,但替加氟的骨髓抑制作用最小,这使其适合与骨髓抑制性抗肿瘤药物联合使用。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of oral tegafur and intravenous 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.口服替加氟与静脉注射5-氟尿嘧啶治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的对比研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1983 Apr;6(2):181-6. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198304000-00007.
2
Oral ftorafur versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil. A comparative study in patients with colorectal cancer.口服替加氟与静脉注射5-氟尿嘧啶。一项针对结直肠癌患者的比较研究。
Acta Oncol. 1987;26(6):433-6. doi: 10.3109/02841868709113713.
3
Phase I-II studies of oral tegafur (ftorafur).口服替加氟(喃氟啶)的I-II期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1983 Feb;1(2):107-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1983.1.2.107.
4
Phase II study of oral tegafur-uracil and folinic acid as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Taiwan experience.口服替加氟-尿嘧啶与亚叶酸钙作为转移性结直肠癌一线治疗的II期研究:台湾经验
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov;30(11):510-4. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyd124.
5
Phase II trial of uracil and tegafur plus oral leucovorin: an effective oral regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.尿嘧啶和替加氟加口服亚叶酸钙的II期试验:一种治疗转移性结直肠癌的有效口服方案。
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Nov;12(11):2296-300. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.11.2296.
6
Uracil and tegafur modulated with leucovorin: an effective regimen with low toxicity for the treatment of colorectal carcinoma in the elderly. Oncopaz Cooperative Group.亚叶酸钙调节的尿嘧啶和替加氟:一种治疗老年结直肠癌的低毒性有效方案。Oncopaz合作组
Cancer. 1997 May 15;79(10):1884-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<1884::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-g.
7
Treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma with the combination of etoposide plus oral tegafur modulated by uracil and leucovorin. A phase II study of the ONCOPAZ Cooperative Group.依托泊苷联合口服替加氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙治疗晚期胃癌患者。ONCOPAZ协作组的一项II期研究。
Cancer. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):211-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<211::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-O.
8
Phase II evaluation of aclacinomycin A (ACM-A, NSC208734) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1983 Apr;6(2):187-90. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198304000-00008.
9
Phase I evaluation of oral tegafur.替加氟口服制剂的Ⅰ期评估
Cancer Treat Rep. 1983 Jan;67(1):81-4.
10
Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.尿嘧啶/替加氟与口服亚叶酸钙对比氟尿嘧啶与亚叶酸钙用于既往未治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的多中心III期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 1;20(17):3605-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.123.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative analysis of hydrogen and chalcogen bonds in two pyrimidine-5-carbonitrile derivatives, potential DHFR inhibitors: an integrated crystallographic and theoretical study.两种嘧啶-5-腈衍生物(潜在的二氢叶酸还原酶抑制剂)中氢和硫族元素键的定量分析:一项晶体学与理论相结合的研究
RSC Adv. 2020 Oct 6;10(60):36806-36817. doi: 10.1039/d0ra07215j. eCollection 2020 Oct 1.
2
Structural Insights of Three 2,4-Disubstituted Dihydropyrimidine-5-carbonitriles as Potential Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors.三种 2,4-二取代二氢嘧啶-5-甲腈作为潜在二氢叶酸还原酶抑制剂的结构见解。
Molecules. 2021 May 29;26(11):3286. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113286.
3
Oral versus intravenous fluoropyrimidines for colorectal cancer.
口服与静脉注射氟嘧啶用于治疗结直肠癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD008398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008398.pub2.
4
Open-label trial on efficacy and security of treatment with gemcitabine and oral modulation with tegafur and levofolinic acid (GEMTG) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.吉西他滨联合替加氟和左亚叶酸(GEMTG)口服调节治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效和安全性开放性试验。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Jan;13(1):61-6. doi: 10.1007/s12094-011-0618-9.
5
Tegafur and 5-fluorouracil pelvic tissue concentrations in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2006 Jul;8(7):500-7. doi: 10.1007/s12094-006-0050-8.
6
Cellular pharmacology of fluorinated pyrimidines in vivo in man.
Invest New Drugs. 1989 Apr;7(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00178188.