Parker J O
Am J Cardiol. 1983 Apr;51(7):1062-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90345-4.
Twenty-two patients with chronic, stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris were assessed during periods of therapy with propranolol, standard-formulation pindolol, and a slow-release preparation of pindolol. Patients maintained diaries of the frequency of angina pectoris and nitroglycerin consumption and underwent treadmill exercise testing at 2 weekly intervals. No significant differences were observed in nitroglycerin consumption or anginal frequency during these 3 treatment programs. Resting heart rates were higher with pindolol than with propranolol, but no differences were noted between periods on standard and slow-release pindolol. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar during therapy with these 3 treatment programs. Treadmill walking time to the development of moderate angina and systolic and diastolic blood pressure was similar during treatment with propranolol, standard-formulation pindolol, and slow-release pindolol. Exercise heart rates were slightly higher during therapy with slow-release pindolol than during standard-formulation pindolol. It is concluded that propranolol, pindolol, and slow-release pindolol are equally effective in the management of patients with chronic, stable, exercise-induced angina.
对22例慢性、稳定型运动诱发型心绞痛患者在使用普萘洛尔、标准剂型吲哚洛尔和吲哚洛尔缓释制剂治疗期间进行了评估。患者记录心绞痛发作频率和硝酸甘油用量,并每隔2周进行一次平板运动试验。在这3个治疗方案期间,硝酸甘油用量或心绞痛发作频率未观察到显著差异。吲哚洛尔治疗时静息心率高于普萘洛尔,但标准剂型吲哚洛尔和缓释吲哚洛尔治疗期间未发现差异。这3个治疗方案治疗期间收缩压和舒张压相似。在使用普萘洛尔、标准剂型吲哚洛尔和缓释吲哚洛尔治疗期间,出现中度心绞痛时的平板步行时间以及收缩压和舒张压相似。缓释吲哚洛尔治疗期间运动心率略高于标准剂型吲哚洛尔。结论是,普萘洛尔、吲哚洛尔和吲哚洛尔缓释制剂在治疗慢性、稳定型运动诱发型心绞痛患者方面同样有效。