• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宾夕法尼亚居家护理实验:一、对生活质量的影响

The Pennsylvania domiciliary care experiment: I. Impact on quality of life.

作者信息

Sherwood S, Morris J N

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):646-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.646.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.73.6.646
PMID:6405641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1650873/
Abstract

This paper reports findings concerning the impact on quality of life of a case management focused program of small board and care facilities serving aging, mental health, and mental retardation adult target populations--the Pennsylvania Domiciliary Care Program. Program participants from the counties in which the Domiciliary Care Program was initiated were matched with persons residing in similar counties without the program who were comparable on a large array of characteristics prior to program initiation. Conducted separately by target group, 10-month follow-up assessments provided the basis for determining impact. In general, the effects were positive, particularly with respect to meeting program quality of life goals (providing needed services, improving living conditions, increasing community integration, and reducing institutional days); the effects were more positive for the aging and mental health than for the mentally retarded target populations.

摘要

本文报告了一项针对小型寄宿照料设施的病例管理重点项目对生活质量影响的研究结果,该项目服务于老年、心理健康和智力障碍的成年目标人群——宾夕法尼亚州寄宿照料项目。来自启动寄宿照料项目的县的项目参与者与居住在没有该项目的类似县且在项目启动前在一系列特征上具有可比性的人员进行了匹配。针对每个目标群体分别进行了为期10个月的随访评估,为确定影响提供了依据。总体而言,效果是积极的,特别是在实现项目生活质量目标方面(提供所需服务、改善生活条件、增强社区融入度以及减少住院天数);对老年和心理健康目标人群的效果比对智力障碍目标人群的效果更积极。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0942/1650873/80b6b4797461/amjph00641-0045-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0942/1650873/80b6b4797461/amjph00641-0045-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0942/1650873/80b6b4797461/amjph00641-0045-a.jpg

相似文献

1
The Pennsylvania domiciliary care experiment: I. Impact on quality of life.宾夕法尼亚居家护理实验:一、对生活质量的影响
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):646-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.646.
2
Pennsylvania's domiciliary care experiment: II. Cost-benefit implications.宾夕法尼亚州的居家护理实验:II. 成本效益影响。
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):654-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.654.
3
Alternative paths to long-term care: nursing home, geriatric day hospital, senior center, and domiciliary care options.长期护理的替代途径:养老院、老年日间医院、老年中心和居家护理选择。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Jan;76(1):38-44. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.1.38.
4
Home-Based Care Program Reduces Disability And Promotes Aging In Place.居家护理项目可减少残疾并促进就地养老。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1558-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0140.
5
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
Exploring the associations between long-term care and mortality rates among stroke patients.探索中风患者长期护理与死亡率之间的关联。
J Nurs Res. 2005 Mar;13(1):66-74.
7
Development of a mental health home care program.心理健康居家护理项目的开发。
Caring. 1991 Mar;10(3):20-2.
8
Aging mothers and aging daughters: life-long caring and intellectual disability.年迈的母亲与年迈的女儿:终生照料与智力残疾
J Women Aging. 2000;12(1-2):169-87. doi: 10.1300/J074v12n01_11.
9
A randomized controlled trial of the effect of an intensive 1-year care management program on measures of health status in independent, community-living old elderly: the Eldercare project.一项关于强化为期一年的护理管理计划对独立生活在社区中的高龄老人健康状况指标影响的随机对照试验:老年护理项目。
Fam Pract. 2016 Feb;33(1):37-41. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv089. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
10
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.农村姑息支持服务的可行性
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Community care demonstrations: what have we learned?社区护理示范:我们学到了什么?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1987 Summer;8(4):87-100.
2
Pennsylvania's domiciliary care experiment: II. Cost-benefit implications.宾夕法尼亚州的居家护理实验:II. 成本效益影响。
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):654-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.654.
3
Evaluation of alternatives in long-term care.长期护理中替代方案的评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Pennsylvania's domiciliary care experiment: II. Cost-benefit implications.宾夕法尼亚州的居家护理实验:II. 成本效益影响。
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):654-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.654.
2
Measuring the home health needs of the aged in five countries.
J Gerontol. 1971 Jan;26(1):37-40. doi: 10.1093/geronj/26.1.37.
3
A multidisciplinary approach to assessing the quality of care in long-term care facilities.一种评估长期护理机构护理质量的多学科方法。
Gerontologist. 1977 Feb;17(1):61-5. doi: 10.1093/geront/17.1.61.
Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):638-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.638.
4
Alternative paths to long-term care: nursing home, geriatric day hospital, senior center, and domiciliary care options.长期护理的替代途径:养老院、老年日间医院、老年中心和居家护理选择。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Jan;76(1):38-44. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.1.38.
5
Foster home care for the frail elderly as an alternative to nursing home care: an experimental evaluation.为体弱老年人提供寄养家庭护理以替代养老院护理:一项实验性评估。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Dec;77(12):1505-10. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.12.1505.