Plainfosse M C, Delecoeullerie G, Vital J L, Paty E, Merran S
Eur J Radiol. 1983 May;3(2):132-7.
Based on a study of 165 cases of renal carcinoma, we compare the relative diagnosis efficiency of different methods: intravenous urography (IVU), ultrasound (U.S.), arteriography and computed tomography (C.T.). Our evidence enables us to assert the excellent diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and the superiority of computed tomography for good staging of renal carcinoma. The cost efficient methods for the evaluation of this tumour are intravenous urography (to show and localize the renal mass), ultrasound (to assert the echogenic structure) and computed tomography (to establish the diagnosis of carcinoma and judge its spread).
基于对165例肾癌病例的研究，我们比较了不同检查方法的相对诊断效率：静脉肾盂造影（IVU）、超声检查（U.S.）、动脉造影和计算机断层扫描（C.T.）。我们的证据使我们能够断言超声具有出色的诊断准确性，以及计算机断层扫描在肾癌良好分期方面的优越性。评估这种肿瘤的经济有效方法是静脉肾盂造影（用于显示和定位肾脏肿块）、超声检查（用于确定回声结构）和计算机断层扫描（用于确诊癌症并判断其扩散情况）。
