Vincent K R
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Jan;34(1):61-2. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:1<61::aid-jclp2270340112>3.0.co;2-5.
The diagnostic efficiency of the MMPI 168 and the standard MMPI was compared on three private psychiatric subpopulations: a hospitalized adult inpatient sample, a hospitalized adolescent inpatient sample, and an outpatient sample composed of vocational rehabilitation referrals. The MMPI 168 was found to be a viable alternative to the standard Form R on all three groups by separating invalid from valid profiles, normal from abnormal profiles, and by differentiating among neurotic, psychotic, characterological, and indeterminate profiles.
在三个私立精神病亚群体中比较了MMPI 168和标准MMPI的诊断效率:一个住院成人患者样本、一个住院青少年患者样本以及一个由职业康复转诊患者组成的门诊样本。通过区分无效与有效剖析图、正常与异常剖析图,以及区分神经症性、精神病性、性格性和不确定剖析图,发现MMPI 168在所有这三个群体中都是标准R式的可行替代方案。