Holland T R, Watson C G
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Oct;34(4):893-901. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197810)34:4<893::aid-jclp2270340413>3.0.co;2-n.
MMPI profiles of 545 psychiatric inpatients and 560 incarcerated offenders were separated sequentially into normal, sociopathic, neurotic and psychotic groups by means of Goldberg's profile classification rules. Patient-prisoner differences in both rates of classification and profile patterns of groups within diagnostic categories were assessed quantitatively, and profiles were interpreted by use of standard MMPI codebooks. For the hospitalized Ss comparisons also were made between clinical diagnoses and Goldberg-MMPI classifications. The resulting differences in classification rates, similarities of profiles within diagnostic categories, correspondence between obtained and codebook-expected profiles, and agreement between clinical and Goldberg-MMPI classifications were not such that this approach could be used with confidence as a basis for establishing diagnostic group membership. Although Goldberg's system appears to represent certain improvements over previous criterion-related methods of profile classification, it was concluded that its value nonetheless is limited by the assumption of an invariant relationship between test patterns and nontest variables.
运用戈德堡的剖面图分类规则,将545名精神科住院患者和560名被监禁罪犯的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)剖面图依次分为正常组、反社会组、神经症组和精神病组。对诊断类别内两组在分类率和剖面图模式方面的患者-囚犯差异进行了定量评估,并使用标准的MMPI编码本对剖面图进行了解释。对于住院的研究对象,还对临床诊断和戈德堡-MMPI分类之间进行了比较。在分类率方面产生的差异、诊断类别内剖面图的相似性、所获剖面图与编码本预期剖面图之间的对应关系,以及临床诊断和戈德堡-MMPI分类之间的一致性,都不足以使这种方法能够被放心地用作确定诊断组成员资格的依据。尽管戈德堡的系统似乎比以前基于标准的剖面图分类方法有一定改进,但得出的结论是,其价值仍然受到测试模式与非测试变量之间存在不变关系这一假设的限制。