Suppr超能文献

优化血清中α1-抗胰蛋白酶测量的参考值:三种方法的比较

Optimizing reference values for the measurement of alpha 1-antitrypsin in serum: comparison of three methods.

作者信息

Gaidulis L, Muensch H A, Maslow W C, Borer W Z

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1983 Oct;29(10):1838-40.

PMID:6413093
Abstract

We studied three methods (rate nephelometry, radial immunodiffusion, and trypsin-inhibitory capacity) for their ability to detect those individuals with a deficiency of alpha1-antitrypsin. The phenotype represented in 170 serum samples was determined by isoelectric focusing as the reference method. All three methods correctly identified Pi Z, Pi S, and Pi SZ phenotypes but varied in their ability to detect Pi MZ and Pi MS phenotypes. The rate-nephelometric method was the least sensitive in detecting Pi MZ and Pi MS variants because of the inappropriately low reference interval suggested by the manufacturer. We found that the three screening methods are comparable when the limiting values are properly selected. We suggest that the reference value for the rate-nephelometric method be increased from 0.85 g/L to 1.40 g/L to improve the sensitivity of the test.

摘要

我们研究了三种检测α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏个体的方法(速率散射比浊法、放射免疫扩散法和胰蛋白酶抑制能力法)。通过等电聚焦作为参考方法来确定170份血清样本所代表的表型。所有三种方法都能正确识别Pi Z、Pi S和Pi SZ表型,但在检测Pi MZ和Pi MS表型的能力上有所不同。速率散射比浊法在检测Pi MZ和Pi MS变异体时最不敏感,因为制造商建议的参考区间过低。我们发现,当适当选择临界值时,这三种筛查方法具有可比性。我们建议将速率散射比浊法的参考值从0.85 g/L提高到1.40 g/L,以提高检测的灵敏度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验