Gaidulis L, Muensch H A, Maslow W C, Borer W Z
Clin Chem. 1983 Oct;29(10):1838-40.
We studied three methods (rate nephelometry, radial immunodiffusion, and trypsin-inhibitory capacity) for their ability to detect those individuals with a deficiency of alpha1-antitrypsin. The phenotype represented in 170 serum samples was determined by isoelectric focusing as the reference method. All three methods correctly identified Pi Z, Pi S, and Pi SZ phenotypes but varied in their ability to detect Pi MZ and Pi MS phenotypes. The rate-nephelometric method was the least sensitive in detecting Pi MZ and Pi MS variants because of the inappropriately low reference interval suggested by the manufacturer. We found that the three screening methods are comparable when the limiting values are properly selected. We suggest that the reference value for the rate-nephelometric method be increased from 0.85 g/L to 1.40 g/L to improve the sensitivity of the test.
我们研究了三种检测α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏个体的方法(速率散射比浊法、放射免疫扩散法和胰蛋白酶抑制能力法)。通过等电聚焦作为参考方法来确定170份血清样本所代表的表型。所有三种方法都能正确识别Pi Z、Pi S和Pi SZ表型,但在检测Pi MZ和Pi MS表型的能力上有所不同。速率散射比浊法在检测Pi MZ和Pi MS变异体时最不敏感,因为制造商建议的参考区间过低。我们发现,当适当选择临界值时,这三种筛查方法具有可比性。我们建议将速率散射比浊法的参考值从0.85 g/L提高到1.40 g/L,以提高检测的灵敏度。