• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟医生对患者严重程度判断的可行性。

Feasibility of simulating physicians' judgments of patient severity.

作者信息

Choi T, Brekke M L, Campion B C, Long L A, Brekke M

出版信息

Med Care. 1984 Jan;22(1):30-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198401000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198401000-00003
PMID:6420623
Abstract

This article reports on adopting Gustafson's multiattribute utility method to develop a specific momentary severity index (vis-à-vis severity over time) for nontraumatic chest pain patients. A panel of physicians identified an appropriate set of indicators for the index. Three mathematic models were generated on the basis of these indicators with each model predicting no less than 81% of the variance in overall scores of 96 simulated patients with chest pain. High interrater reliability (0.94) was demonstrated. Congruent validity coefficients between the three model scores and the overall scores vary between 0.71 and 0.92 depending on how the panel physicians are grouped. Results indicate the feasibility of simulating physician judgments regarding patient severity in chest-pain-related cases.

摘要

本文报道了采用古斯塔夫森的多属性效用方法,为非创伤性胸痛患者开发一个特定的瞬时严重程度指数(相对于随时间的严重程度)。一组医生确定了该指数的一组合适指标。基于这些指标生成了三个数学模型,每个模型对96例模拟胸痛患者的总体得分方差的预测率均不低于81%。结果显示了较高的评分者间信度(0.94)。根据对专家小组医生的分组方式不同,三个模型得分与总体得分之间的一致性效度系数在0.71至0.92之间变化。结果表明,在与胸痛相关的病例中模拟医生对患者严重程度的判断是可行的。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of simulating physicians' judgments of patient severity.模拟医生对患者严重程度判断的可行性。
Med Care. 1984 Jan;22(1):30-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198401000-00003.
2
Triage of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a comparative study of physicians' decisions.急诊科胸痛患者的分诊:医生决策的比较研究
Am J Med. 2002 Feb 1;112(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01054-3.
3
A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain.一种用于辅助诊断急诊室急性胸痛患者的计算机生成协议。
N Engl J Med. 1982 Sep 2;307(10):588-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198209023071004.
4
Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference?急诊科胸痛患者的分诊决策:医生的风险态度会产生影响吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Oct;10(10):557-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02640365.
5
A behavioral analysis of chest pain in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.对疑似患有冠状动脉疾病患者胸痛的行为分析。
Psychosom Med. 1985 May-Jun;47(3):274-84. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198505000-00005.
6
Prognostic judgments and triage decisions for patients with acute congestive heart failure.急性充血性心力衰竭患者的预后判断与分诊决策
Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1610-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1610.
7
Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.医生对阿尔茨海默病患者的法律标准与个人能力判断的一致性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Aug;48(8):911-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06887.x.
8
Multiattribute utility scores for predicting family physicians' decisions regarding sinusitis.用于预测家庭医生关于鼻窦炎决策的多属性效用评分
Med Decis Making. 1999 Jan-Mar;19(1):58-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900108.
9
Estimating neonatal mortality risk: an analysis of clinicians' judgments.评估新生儿死亡风险:临床医生判断分析
Pediatrics. 1994 Jun;93(6 Pt 1):945-50.
10
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.

引用本文的文献

1
Health risk appraisal: its role in health services research.健康风险评估:其在卫生服务研究中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 1987 Oct;22(4):453-65.