Minnema D J, Rosecrans J A
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Jan;20(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90108-4.
Male adult Sprague-Dawley rats (70 days of age), neonatally depleted of either 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) via 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT; ICS) + desmethylimipramine (DMI; IP) at 3 days of age or dopamine (DA) via 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA; ICS) + DMI at 14 days of age, were trained to discriminate either d-LSD-tartrate (80 micrograms/kg; IP) or d-amphetamine (d-AMPH) sulfate (0.90 mg/kg; IP) from saline utilizing a two lever drug discrimination paradigm. A neurochemical analysis at the termination of these studies revealed the following in terms of %DA or %5HT (presented in that order) depleted with respect to the appropriate vehicle control group: telencephalon; 96 and 96%, diencephalon; 51 and 31%, and brain stem; 76 and 80%. Rats learned to discriminate either d-AMPH or LSD regardless of amine depleted. In addition, the depletion of 5HT had little effects on dose or drug generalizations, or the ability of known antagonists to antagonize the discrimination stimulus (DS) effects of either LSD or d-AMPH. The effect of DA depletion, on the other hand, was to increase the sensitivity of the LSD DS at low doses, while decreasing the sensitivity of the d-amphetamine DS. DA depletion also had the effect of reducing the effectiveness of the LSD-antagonists, pizotifen maleate (BC105), while the opposite was observed for the d-AMPH antagonist, trifluoperazine HCI. These data suggest that: (1) LSD and d-amphetamine discrimination stimuli are not mediated and/or influenced via the compromised aspects of the 5HT systems (other central mechanisms may have compromised for these 5HT deficits); (2) the LSD DS is mediated or influenced both by serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms; and (3) the d-amphetamine DS is mediated by certain aspects of the dopaminergic system with little evidence for the involvement of 5HT systems.
成年雄性斯普拉格-道利大鼠(70日龄),在出生3天时经5,7-二羟基色胺(5,7-DHT;脑室内注射)+去甲丙咪嗪(DMI;腹腔注射)使5-羟色胺(5HT)新生期耗竭,或在出生14天时经6-羟基多巴胺(6-OHDA;脑室内注射)+DMI使多巴胺(DA)新生期耗竭,利用双杠杆药物辨别范式训练它们从生理盐水辨别酒石酸d-LSD(80微克/千克;腹腔注射)或硫酸d-苯丙胺(d-AMPH)(0.90毫克/千克;腹腔注射)。这些研究结束时的神经化学分析显示,相对于相应的溶剂对照组,以下是按该顺序呈现的DA或5HT的耗竭百分比:端脑;96%和96%,间脑;51%和31%,以及脑干;76%和80%。无论胺类耗竭情况如何,大鼠都学会了辨别d-AMPH或LSD。此外,5HT的耗竭对剂量或药物泛化,或已知拮抗剂拮抗LSD或d-AMPH辨别刺激(DS)效应的能力几乎没有影响。另一方面,DA耗竭的作用是在低剂量时增加LSD DS的敏感性,同时降低d-苯丙胺DS的敏感性。DA耗竭还具有降低LSD拮抗剂马来酸匹莫齐特(BC105)有效性的作用,而对于d-AMPH拮抗剂盐酸三氟拉嗪则观察到相反的情况。这些数据表明:(1)LSD和d-苯丙胺辨别刺激不是通过5HT系统受损方面介导和/或影响的(其他中枢机制可能因这些5HT缺陷而受损);(2)LSD DS由5-羟色胺能和多巴胺能机制介导或影响;(3)d-苯丙胺DS由多巴胺能系统的某些方面介导,几乎没有证据表明5HT系统参与其中。