Fulton M J, Barer M L
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 May 1;130(9):1149-56.
The direct costs of screening for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) are compared with the treatment costs resulting from no screening in a cost-effectiveness analysis in British Columbia. Under certain conditions the costs associated with screening and subsequent conservative treatment for 6 to 15 positive cases of CDH/1000 liveborn infants were considerably lower than the costs of either open or closed reduction of the hip for 1.5 infants with CDH per 1000 infants not screened. When adjustments were made to the assumptions about screening costs, rates with which cases were missed and hospital treatment costs, only the assumptions thought to be overly unfavourable to screening and overly optimistic for no screening brought the costs of no screening within the likely range of costs of screening. Some specific and general implications of the cost-effectiveness of screening for CDH in British Columbia are discussed.
在不列颠哥伦比亚省进行的一项成本效益分析中,对先天性髋关节脱位(CDH)筛查的直接成本与未进行筛查所产生的治疗成本进行了比较。在某些条件下,对每1000例活产婴儿中6至15例CDH阳性病例进行筛查及后续保守治疗的成本,远低于每1000例未筛查婴儿中1.5例CDH婴儿进行髋关节切开复位或闭合复位的成本。当对筛查成本、漏诊率和医院治疗成本的假设进行调整时,只有那些被认为对筛查过于不利且对未筛查过于乐观的假设,才会使未筛查的成本处于筛查成本的可能范围内。文中讨论了不列颠哥伦比亚省CDH筛查成本效益的一些具体和普遍影响。