Suppr超能文献

百日咳与百日咳疫苗。效益、风险及成本的重新分析。

Pertussis and pertussis vaccine. Reanalysis of benefits, risks, and costs.

作者信息

Hinman A R, Koplan J P

出版信息

JAMA. 1984 Jun 15;251(23):3109-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.251.23.3109.

Abstract

Using recently published information, we examined the experience of a hypothetical cohort of 1 million children followed up from birth to 6 years of age without and with a pertussis vaccination program. Costs associated with death or lost wages were not estimated. A vaccination program reaching 90% of children would reduce disease incidence and disease-related costs by 90%. Taking into account costs associated with vaccine and vaccine reactions, the costs are reduced 82%. The ratio of overall costs without a program to those with a program is 5.7:1. The benefit-cost ratio is 11.1:1. Because we did not include indirect costs, this is a conservative estimate. Until improved vaccines are available, continued use of our present vaccines, with careful attention to possible contraindications, seems the only prudent course to follow.

摘要

利用最近公布的信息,我们研究了一个假设队列的情况,该队列包含100万名儿童,从出生到6岁,分别处于没有百日咳疫苗接种计划和有该计划的情况下。未估算与死亡或工资损失相关的成本。一个覆盖90%儿童的疫苗接种计划将使疾病发病率和与疾病相关的成本降低90%。考虑到与疫苗及疫苗反应相关的成本,成本降低了82%。无计划情况下的总成本与有计划情况下的总成本之比为5.7:1。效益成本比为11.1:1。由于我们未纳入间接成本,这是一个保守估计。在有更好的疫苗可用之前,继续使用我们现有的疫苗,并仔细关注可能的禁忌情况,似乎是唯一谨慎的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验