Willner P
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;83(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00427414.
Eighteen animal models of depression are reviewed in relation to three sets of validating criteria. Of the 18 models, five could only be assessed for predictive validity, seven could be assessed for predictive and face validity, and six could potentially have predictive, face and construct validity. Some traditional models (reserpine reversal, amphetamine potentiation) are rejected as invalid; the models with the highest overall validity are the intracranial self-stimulation, chronic stress and learned helplessness models in rats, and the primate separation model.
针对三组验证标准对18种抑郁症动物模型进行了综述。在这18种模型中,5种仅可评估预测效度,7种可评估预测效度和表面效度,6种可能具有预测效度、表面效度和结构效度。一些传统模型(利血平逆转、苯丙胺增强)被判定为无效而遭摒弃;总体效度最高的模型是大鼠的颅内自我刺激模型、慢性应激模型和习得性无助模型,以及灵长类动物分离模型。