• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用形态学标准和斑点吲哚试验作为常规方法鉴定大肠杆菌及其成本节约情况。

Use of and cost savings with morphologic criteria and the spot indole test as a routine means of identification of Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Bale M J, McLaws S M, Fenn J P, Matsen J M

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Jun;2(3):187-91. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90029-4.

DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(84)90029-4
PMID:6430630
Abstract

The use of primary isolation plate colonial morphologic criteria (CMC) of a flat, nonmucoid, lactose-fermenting, gram-negative rod on MacConkey agar and the spot indole (SI) test from the sheep blood agar plate was evaluated as a means for identification of Escherichia coli in comparison to kit (Micro-ID, API-20E) and conventional biochemical testing. In this preliminary phase of comparison of accuracy, 427 isolates of E. coli (69.8%) from a total of 612 isolates of lactose-fermenting gram-negative rods were evaluated. Of these E. coli isolates, 357 (83.6%) fit the CMC and were SI positive; 3 (less than 1% error rate) were not E. coli. In the second phase of the evaluation, using CMC and SI alone as a means for identification of E. coli, 472 (57.6%) E. coli isolates from a total of 820 Enterobacteriaceae isolates were assessed. Of these E. coli isolates, 326 could be identified using only CMC and SI (69.1% of the E. coli isolates and 39.8% of all Enterobacteriaceae isolates); 146 (30.9%) required additional biochemical testing because of atypical colonial morphology, because of the investigator's inability to differentiate colony types on both media or lack of isolated colonies on either of the two required media, or because as isolates from sterile body sites they were processed directly to Micro-ID kits. A minimum of 40% savings on Enterobacteriaceae identification schemes without compromising accuracy was calculated. As of November 1983, a direct (labor and materials) cost savings of approximately +200.80 per 100 Enterobacteriaceae identifications was projected.

摘要

在MacConkey琼脂上使用扁平、非黏液性、乳糖发酵、革兰氏阴性杆菌的初代分离平板菌落形态学标准(CMC)以及来自羊血琼脂平板的吲哚斑点试验(SI),并与试剂盒(Micro-ID、API-20E)和传统生化检测方法相比较,以此作为鉴定大肠杆菌的手段。在这个准确性比较的初步阶段,对总共612株乳糖发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌中的427株大肠杆菌分离株(69.8%)进行了评估。在这些大肠杆菌分离株中,357株(83.6%)符合CMC且SI呈阳性;3株(错误率小于1%)不是大肠杆菌。在评估的第二阶段,仅使用CMC和SI作为鉴定大肠杆菌的手段,对总共820株肠杆菌科分离株中的472株大肠杆菌分离株(57.6%)进行了评估。在这些大肠杆菌分离株中,仅使用CMC和SI就可鉴定出326株(占大肠杆菌分离株的69.1%,占所有肠杆菌科分离株的39.8%);146株(30.9%)因菌落形态不典型、研究者无法区分两种培养基上的菌落类型、两种所需培养基上均缺乏分离菌落,或者因为它们是来自无菌身体部位的分离株而直接用Micro-ID试剂盒处理,所以需要额外的生化检测。计算得出在不影响准确性的情况下,肠杆菌科鉴定方案至少节省40%。截至1983年11月,预计每100次肠杆菌科鉴定可直接节省(劳动力和材料)成本约200.80美元。

相似文献

1
Use of and cost savings with morphologic criteria and the spot indole test as a routine means of identification of Escherichia coli.使用形态学标准和斑点吲哚试验作为常规方法鉴定大肠杆菌及其成本节约情况。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Jun;2(3):187-91. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90029-4.
2
Simplified scheme for identification of prompt lactose-fermenting members of the Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科快速乳糖发酵菌成员的简化方案。
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Dec;4(6):511-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.6.511-514.1976.
3
An evaluation of the practicality of the spot-indole test for the identification of Escherichia coli in the clinical microbiology laboratory.临床微生物实验室中斑点吲哚试验用于鉴定大肠杆菌的实用性评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Nov;78(5):755-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.5.755.
4
Multilaboratory validation of rapid spot tests for identification of Escherichia coli.用于鉴定大肠杆菌的快速即时检测的多实验室验证
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Sep;38(9):3394-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.9.3394-3398.2000.
5
A cost-effective method for the presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae for diagnostic microbiology laboratories.一种用于诊断微生物学实验室的肠杆菌科初步鉴定的经济型方法。
Pathology. 2010 Apr;42(3):280-3. doi: 10.3109/00313021003631338.
6
Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的MICRO-ID、API 20E和传统培养基系统的临床评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):161-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.161-167.1979.
7
Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.微量鉴定法与API 20E法在快速鉴定肠杆菌科细菌中的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):885-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.885-890.1982.
8
Use of the RIM Escherichia coli Kit for rapid identification of Escherichia coli.使用RIM大肠杆菌检测试剂盒快速鉴定大肠杆菌。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Dec;86(6):761-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/86.6.761.
9
Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1980 Dec;28(10):681-4.
10
Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Micro-ID系统与API 20E系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 May;9(5):605-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.5.605-608.1979.