Suppr超能文献

用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Micro-ID系统与API 20E系统的比较

Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

作者信息

Blazevic D J, Mackay D L, Warwood N M

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 May;9(5):605-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.5.605-608.1979.

Abstract

The Micro-ID 4-h identification system for Enterobacteriaceae was compared to the API 20E overnight method, using 230 fresh clinical isolates and 74 stock cultures. Agreement was 97.8% for the clinical isolates and 93.2% for the stock cultures. Eighty-seven percent of primary culture plates containing gram-negative rods yielded sufficient growth to perform the 4-h Micro-ID identification on the same day the organisms were isolated.

摘要

采用230株新鲜临床分离株和74株标准菌株,将用于肠杆菌科细菌的Micro-ID 4小时鉴定系统与API 20E过夜鉴定方法进行比较。临床分离株的符合率为97.8%,标准菌株的符合率为93.2%。含有革兰氏阴性杆菌的原始培养平板中有87%产生了足够的生长量,能够在分离出细菌的同一天进行4小时的Micro-ID鉴定。

相似文献

5
Performance of two four-hour identification systems with atypical strains of Enterobacteriaceae.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Dec;2(6):529-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02016560.
9

引用本文的文献

6
Effect of refrigeration on inoculated Micro-ID strips.冷藏对接种的微生物鉴定条的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Sep;14(3):350-1. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.3.350-351.1981.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验